You're still deflecting dumbass. The point has nothing to do with the legitimacy of the people running BLM. BLM has been turned into a code-word to describe any black person who speaks truth to power regarding racism. Any black person who protests the police is described as being part of BLM whether they actually are or not. Trump's pledge of allegiance to the police was a direct slap in the face to all blacks and a dog whistle to the cops telling them that their sanctioned terrorism of black people would continue under his watch. We don't have to agree with BLM's ultimate agenda but we all should agree that police being allowed to terrorize our communities with impunity is wrong.
This country was founded on racism/white supremacy you stupid fukk. This country has always been divided upon racial lines and whites have always oppressed non whites to ensure privilege. They exterminated the natives and stole blacks from Africa to use as slaves. Trump panders to white people who want to make those racial divides and the oppression of non whites even more clear and pronounced. That's what "make America great AGAIN" means. That's a dog whistle to those who want to bring back old fashioned in your face Jim Crow.
The only reason that Tump scares the establishment is because he's a loose canon who they don't have full control over because he has his own money/brand. It doesn't have anything to do with him being a threat to the status quo. He's clearly not. Them trying to sabotage his run for the nomination is irrelevant to whether Trump is a racist or not.
He will not win, but I see many posters and the average person alike are falling for the okie doke by regressive authoritarian liberals, which are the true threat to this nation. Not some rich guy pandering to rednecks to get votes.
Are you white?
at "authoritarian liberals.....the true threat to this nation". Trump is actually a liberal his damn self. He's actually supported the clinton's in the past. You're one of these people who doesn't think for theirself and just parrots what you see on TV. I don't know why dumb motherfukkers like to argue.
Trump could very well win. At this point it's a toss up between him and Clinton. Hillary is a weak ass damaged candidate who's very vulnerable. She's having a trouble with a 70+ year old east coast Jew socialist who wasn't well known in a rigged race. We live in a scary ass dumbed down celebrity obsessed society. I wouldn't be surprised at all if Trump wins.
at you being a stupid motherfukker who doesn't understand game.[/QUOTE]
"argue?" It's a discussion, friend, a contentious one but a discussion nonetheless. "dumbass, stupid fukk" How progressive of you breh. For the record I'm a dirty hybrid cac spic, a pretty one at that
and my last line in the previous post was sarcastic
Listen, I don't need the history lesson, I know it quite well, but I think you need some more perspective if you really think authoritarian liberals aren't the biggest threat to our nation
right now. Freedom of speech is being trampled on to not hurt people's feelings, our politicians are becoming more and more outward as far as their "progrssive policies." Look at what's going on in Europe with the immigrants shyt. Blatantly letting hunderds of thousands of military age men into their country under the guise of progressivism. For the record I don't really watch television all that much other than the sporting events I'm gambling on inb4 "No shyt you don't watch tv you racist cac! You're an idiot!"
These politicians are getting more and more bold. Hilary, Trudeau, Merkel, shyt is about to get real big dog.
I'm not going to repeat myself for the 3rd or 4th time, we know whom Trump appeals to and how he's doing it. Blatantly clear. I've already said in numerous posts that Trump is pretending to be a conservative to have a chance. Ohterwise he'd have no shot in a race against a candidate like Hilary.
And I'm not going to call you retarded, but Sanders never had a fukking shot and Hilary by no means is "having trouble." That's patently false. Anyone that doesn't have a mathematical shot of winning is hardly having trouble. Sure he won in a few places and has done a good job of playing the role of the hipster progressive candidate to appeal to dumb-dumbs, but he never had a shot and probably won't even "cover" the spread.
She's looked bad at times in debates, but I think that's more a case of her campaign running the clock out rather than playing to win. They're going to play it safe against Sanders and when it comes Trump time, she's going to go hard.
And it's not a toss-up for the general, Hilary is a healthy favorite to win. Go check the odds. Trump is definitely a live dog, but I wouldn't bet on him winning. I think Hilary is a lock, so much so I'm going to put every dollar in my bank account on that fine ass reptilian to win the election.
However if you think it's that close, I advise you to put some of your bread on Trump, he's a juicy underdog right now.