David_TheMan
Banned
Im not mad...Im convinced
Convinced that you guys biasness shows no limits, especially when someone says Bernard Hopkins wins over DLH & Trinidad didn't do as much for his legacy as beating Tarver & Pascal or that Hagler's legacy is not based around his fights with smaller guys such as SRL, Hearns, & Duran (all in whom he fought in there very FIRST fights at MW) but instead the others he beat at 160
That's just to me and shows me that yall have agendas.
There's no point in Lomachenko facing Rigondeaux, bc he already said this would happen after he beats Rigo....yall saying it before they even sign the contract to make it official
I hope Arum comes up with a scheme and pulls Loma out the fight since yall coming out with these bs weight excuses after saying Lomachenko was scared
You seem a little aggravated about the fact that big men fighting smaller men has never been huge for the bigger man's legacy. He is the bigger man, when he wins he is supposed to win.
Bhop fights were big money fights, but as a career MW no one, not even Bhop would argue those fights made his career, it was moving up and being the holdest champ that cemented his legacy as a great.
I said Hagler did what he was supposed to in beating SRL (we know he was robbed), Hearns, and Duran, his legacy isn't defined by them, but in his dominance at 160, you deny that or do you really think he wouldn't be an ATG without them on his resume?
Loma had the chance to make this fight more fair for his legacy by trying to meet at a catchweight and do it earlier, he refused, he made him jump up 2 weight classes for the fight, sorry you aren't getting any props if you win, just like John Ruiz wouldn't have gotten any props if he beat RJJ.