They still didn't get the price right. they put it at $399 so they could keep making profit off the markup they sitting been on and at the same time not turn casuals away at first glance with that $100 diff. but for folks that know there's a tech difference who were waiting till after E3 to cop one like me, shyt kinda feels like a slap in the face. The 360 wouldn't of cost $600 like the launch ps3 with backwards comp., all the usb ports/microSD slots, and blu-ray player. so how is it the xbox costs the exact same as the PS4 with a weaker gpu, weaker ram, slower cpu, and overall worse architecture? the thing is just built worse, its bigger, weaker, and shyt even the controller is outdated still using aa batteries. nobody buys batteries like that in 2014, why do i have to go out and buy some third party rechargeable batteries just to use my controller like i would if i had bought a ps4?
At least earlier there was some debate over how much value kinect had now it's nothing but box to box, they had the better deal when they were offering titanfall w/kinect for $450 I would've never used the camera but its free and who doesn't like free shyt? now if i buy xbox one i pay the same $450 and dont get a camera. fukk off.
We'll just have to wait and see. Funny how you never answered my question though? How will it run on the stugglebox? That's right, inferior to the ps4. 
The writing is on the wall breh. Have you not been following the L's theyve taken in the last month alone?
box still have folks out here using AA batteries in their controllers????? what kinda nonsense is that? it was totally unacceptable with the 360, and its even more unacceptable in 2014 with the X1.
M$ forcing nikkaz to buy AA batteries like they just bought a panasonic walkman.
