Live video: George Zimmerman Trial - jury selection, trial, verdict, eye rolling

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

Looks like he's wasting his time to get to 5:00 so they don't have to begin their case until Monday.

 

[kdub83]

I don't think any judge wants to be in the position for the outrage of this. They gonna let the jury decide.

I agree. There is no way in hell she is about to accept this motion. There would be hell to pay for real.

 

[Swagnificent]

This guy Soprano is now posting Glenn Beck videos. You know where he stands on these issues.

he's a cac

are you actually surprised?

 

[kdub83]

Looks like he's wasting his time to get to 5:00 so they don't have to begin their case until Monday.

I think so too.

SN: She looks annoyed as hell that he is stalling too

 

[Numpsay]

The defense also have to prove themselves in a self-defense case.

Fact: Zimmerman killed Trayvon.

Now it's up to Zimmerman to prove that killing Trayvon was justified.

No they don't, the burden is on the prosecution.

 

[spoiled]

I don't think any judge wants to be in the position for the outrage of this. They gonna let the jury decide.

the judge isnt even pretending to listen to o'mara

 

[Leasy]

I wish this judge was meaner.

 

[Lana Kane]

He's filibustering

 

[daze23]

No they don't, the burden is on the prosecution.

the burden isn't so one sided when Zimmerman admits that he shot Tray with his gun

 

[HarlemUSA]

its going to be hard. if trayvon really beat the shyt out of dude, why is there no GZ hair, snot, spit, blood, tears, skin cells, sweat...on Trayvon's hands or clothes?

as a juror id be stuck on that...

I wouldn't that cac did it

 

[El Bombi]

 

[Azul]

Talkin' about moshpits n' shyt

 

[Gravity]

No they don't, the burden is on the prosecution.

You're wrong, and common sense should tell you that.

 

[Leasy]

These guys are clowns

 

[YouMadd?]

This guy Soprano is now posting Glenn Beck videos. You know where he stands on these issues.

I pretty much just skim over his posts... He almost never brings intelligent discussion or new insight to the table in any thread. In this thread specifically, it is obvious he hasn't been watching the case, just light summaries on the news mixed in with opinions of news "experts"...