so are you saying light isnt visible
no
I'm saying there's ways to observe things that can't be seen with a camera/eye. can you 'see' your wi-fi signal?
LHC Collisions may be producing a new type of matter
- Thread starter Type Username Here
- Start date
no
I'm saying there's ways to observe things that can't be seen with a camera/eye. can you 'see' your wi-fi signal?
As you can see, the spiral of blue on the perceived end is the center with the rest as the tail...showing that torus shape universal flow coincides with string theory of liquidity, imo.
Its acc. The universe b/c of its data output and because its already "bent" when that travel should bend the space around it irrelevant of location
in for the LoLz 
so are you saying light isnt visible
they're colliding particles almost at the speed of light, not light itself, and measuring the results with particle detectors. its not visible to the naked eye and the process generates 15 million gigs per year and it requires distributed super computers to analyze as well as different statistical and data analytics algorithms to decipher what's going on and the process take some time. the data is accessible to scientist an physics departments all over the world so it's not like they're trying to hide something.
smh i can't believe i spent so many years caught up in church... that boy science is doin thangs 
The data isnt hidden the meaning of it is. Particles at faster than light, theoretically slowed down and altered by observance (double slit experiment), specifically in above pictures, by the application of time to the experiment...means that whatever they are measuring is bound by the limits of intelligence and artificial intelligence, things that at this point in time can not properly measure this effect in its application to the lhc exp because its Impossible to scientifically verify that with enough certainty to deduce any thing that we cant already deduce from other phenomenon more effectively and efficiently.
They are making a mountain out of a molehill. But so be it, if it stimulates positivity, ultimately.
My theory in another thread delves into how the big bang had a resulting algorithm..check out the existence no sense thread.
Then try to tell me more.
no shyt, thus the need for statistics to try and get some meaning or patterns out of the data
nah i'm good you on some other shytIf all they are doing ultimately is advanced statistics (ap in hs and game theory in college) then it is a waste of time..
The lhc mustve changed my neg rep lolz
Always has to be one retard who will argue and argue for pages...
If you read my posts and think im a retard, or that im doing more than trying to stimulate discussion on the topic..then you must truly be sensitive. Wont post again. Your welcome.
GRAMMAR POLICE
WOOOO WOOOOO PULL OVAAAAH
