Lets watch a black scientist at work. Dr. Carl Hart

[Dwolf]

You catch more flies with honey.....

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I like the study on crack cocaine but, I think he came to his conclusion without taking into account certain things such as when people buy crack on the street it is stepped on and the other substances may be part of the addictive qualities that we see. As well as needing more crack to achieve a good high and that gives them that fiend personality of always looking for crack.

He mentions that in other videos when you talk about what its cut with.

He used pharmaceutical grade crack which means it's the best And that is very hard to get. When you drain your dopamine with some good crack you will be relaxed or slow. If anyone has seen a hardcore crack addict you will know this. They get burnt out. Also all that adrenaline that gets released can cause a lot of health problems down the line. I think the reason this is research of his is getting pushed is for two reasons. To have people say drug addiction is someones choice so they can give high arrest rates amd for somewho want to legalize drugs. It's a good start but it's based on halfway done research.

Then you weren't listening.

Dude doesn't want to increase the number of people being arrested. How did you seriously come away with this?

He's not saying crack doesn't harm you either. He's saying that the incentives behind crack use aren't being treated fairly or analyzed.

Also, the part on meth addicts not having cognitive damage may be true of meth heads but definitely not true about coke/crack users or even heavy weed smokers.

HE DID NOT SAY THAT.

he's NOT advocating the use of crack/coke/heroin.

He's basically saying that the data DOES NOT incorporate the number of high-functioning drug users in non-poor areas.

Crack users tend to act like little kids and have bad choice making skills. They also get mad real easily. Weed smokers tend to have bad short term memory, and are lazy. Now, if you take into account what tools they use to ingest the drugs or the potency of the drugs, as well as have a healthy social life the outcome will be different. I seen all of this firsthand.

You think THAT dude hasn't seen the evidence or hasn't witnessed it first hand?

He sold the shyt for a minute. He's seen people behave the same way you're saying...

But what he's saying is that the drugs arent the sole issue and complete root/source of all drama as its been made out to be.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

You catch more flies with honey.....

...where are you going with this?

 

[Ezigbo Nwanyi]

Definition of BlackExcellence.

 

[Blackout]

BlackExcellence with dreds.

 

[bouncy]

He mentions that in other videos when you talk about what its cut with.



Then you weren't listening.

Dude doesn't want to increase the number of people being arrested. How did you seriously come away with this?

He's not saying crack doesn't harm you either. He's saying that the incentives behind crack use aren't being treated fairly or analyzed.

HE DID NOT SAY THAT.

he's NOT advocating the use of crack/coke/heroin.

He's basically saying that the data DOES NOT incorporate the number of high-functioning drug users in non-poor areas.



You think THAT dude hasn't seen the evidence or hasn't witnessed it first hand?

He sold the shyt for a minute. He's seen people behave the same way you're saying...

But what he's saying is that the drugs arent the sole issue and complete root/source of all drama as its been made out to be.

Could you read?. I said the reason it's being pushed, not the reason he's pushing it. You have a habit of reading what you want to read.

He stated meth addicts didn't show cognitive defects. Did you watch the video you posted?

Also, I don't care if he sold it, that doesn't mean he's seen it's full effects. Most dealers don't see the effects of the drugs they sell. They just sell it. Unless he actually hung with his clients or grew up in a house full of users, being the seller is not a plus in my eyes. Just smoking out of certain tools will change the outcome of someone having a chance of being a hardcore addict. Unless you know the life, you wouldn't even take this into account. Don't get me wrong I appreciate the finding but, more detail should be put in place before we brag about it because devilish people will use it to hurt the poor. This trickery isn't new if you study history. Plus this knowledge of having a good social life, and not becoming addictive to drugs has been known since the at least the late 90's. It was shown in mice and people who were given heroin, and then given things to do or a loving family.