Lets talk African History: The Kongo Kingdom

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,020
Reputation
10,579
Daps
121,542
Portugese-African Relations

1452: Pope Nicholas V issues a bull authorizing the King of Portugal to make war on the infidels, to conquer their lands, and enslave their natives. Origins of the Curse of Ham. - Dogs of God 116

1479-1480: The Treaty of Alcacovas is signed between Spain and Portugal ending the War of Succession. It is later strengthened giving Portugal sole rights to "discoveries" made on the African coast. - Dogs of God 120

1481: Pope Sixtus IV gives Portugal's Southern Exploration initiatve his blessing through a papal bull called Aeterni regis. It granted sovereignty over "whatever lands and islands shall be found...in the vicinity of Guinea (Africa)." - Dogs of God 120

1482: Kongolese monarchs begin hearing reports of strange ships off the coast of West Africa. These ships surely belonged to Portugese and Genovese sailors and explorers. This marks Portugals first contact with the Kongo Kingdom. - When We Ruled 344

1485: Portugal returns and the two nations exchange envoys. Portugal leaves 4 Christian missionaries (or Inquisitors) at the Kongo court and 4 Mpinda (Kongolese) nobles return with Diogo Cao to Portugal. - When We Ruled 344
1495: Manuel I comes to the throne in Lisbon, Portugal

1508: First slaves are sent to Manuel I as a payment for the Christianization programs.

1512: Portugeuse Regimento is issued by Manuel I as their Kongo policy. The slave trade begins in earnest. - When We Ruled 345

Commentary: One cannot understand slavery without first understanding the political, social, and extremely religious enviroment of 15th century Portugal during the Inquisition. The slave trade started with Portugal and its relationship with the Kingdom of Kongo. During the 15th century (but not limited to it), there was an obsession in Europe with discovering the fabled Christian kingdom of Prestor John. This gave rise to a multitude of navigators and explorers who were determined to circumnavigate Africa in search of this mythic land. Discovering the land of Prestor John wasn't the sole purpose of Portugese explorers though, it was also economic and religious. Word of West Africa's immense wealth was surely known throughout elite society in Europe (specifically Spain, Portugal, and Genoa) and by the late 15th century there was clearly an intent to acquire this wealth. By 1492, gold from Ghana supplied almost half of Portugal's monetary power. This may explain why Popes Nicholas V and Sixtus IV gave Portugal so much authority, essentially a colonial authority. But I disagree that Kongo (Angola) was a technical colony of Portugal as it is commonly referred to as. I'll comment on this later though. Until Manuel I issues the Regimento, Portugal's experience with the Kingdom of Kongo appears to be simply an exploratory one. Some Kongo nobles were even taken to Portugal and taught the native language and showered with gifts. This appears to have been an early ploy to learn more about the geography of Kongo though. But between 1495 and 1512, several Kongolese royals are lured into converting to Christianity and with the Regimento it is implied that to be a good Christian nation, the Kongolese must take Christian names, Christian attire and allow Portugese ambassadors to "advise" the Kongolese king in "reforming" the Kongo court along Christian lines. To make matters worse, Manuel I said Kongo could pay for these programs by exporting copper, ivory, and slaves. The Kongolese agreed under the assumption that they were getting something beneficial out of the "alliance," on top of that the Regimento also labeled ALL Catholic kings as "brothers." This began the serious infiltration of Kongo by the Portugese and also their search for Africa's wealth through the spies they now had in the Kongolese court perpatrating as missionaries.

1526: Dom Affonso I (Christian King of Kongo) sends over 20 letters to Portuguese king Manuel I and his successor John III complaining that Portuguese traders and priests were causing a havoc in his land. Black women were being raped and assaulted and there were frequent slave raids where even nobles and members of the royal family were being taken. His pleas for help fell on deaf ears. - When We Ruled 350

1551: Slaves make up 1/10th of the population of Lisbon, Portugal...almost 10,000 people. Some were being taken to America by this time as well. - Inquistion: The Reign of Fear 90

1556: Civil war breaks out in Kongo between the slave-trading factions of the south in the province of Ndongo and the forces of the king of Kongo, Diogo I. The Portuguese aided boths sides of the war. Ndongo came out on top and became an indepedent state seperate from the Kingdom of Kongo.

Commentary: The relationship between Portugal and Kongo deteriorates very quickly after the 1520's. Dom Affonso I came into power viewing his kingdoms relationship with Portugal as positive it seems. He used Portuguese mercenaries in helping to quell a rebellion by his own brother (a non-Christian). Over the next few years, Affonso would request from the King of Portugal that Christianity be spread even further by sending more priests (Inquisitors) and technicians to build schools and churches. The Church of the Holy Cross was built in 1517 and the Church of Our Lady of the Victories was built in 1526, the same year he began sending letters for help from the Portuguese monarchs. These massive building projects surely increased the number of Portuguese immigrants by the thousands. The slave trading, which at first was an agreement between the two nations, seems to have been getting out of control of the Kongolese. By the mid-16th century, it seems Portuguese agents had infiltrated every aspect of Kongo society. Religious. Social. Administrative. It likely got so bad that Kongolese nobles may have been threatened that to challenge the spread of Christianity in their land would result in their families being thrown into slavery. That's speculation, but it makes sense as to why Kongo elites may have put up with this corrupt system for so long. By 1556, Portugal essentially controls Ndongo as a vassal state which may have led to the civil war.

1569: The Jaga, a semi-barbarian group, invades Kongo from the East and cause the social fabric of an already strained country to breakdown. - When We Ruled 351

1575: The Portuguese, likely from Kongo, launch a series of wars to capture Ndongo because they thought the new country contained silver mines. The wars would carry on to 1622.

1622: Ann Nzinga, the Ndongo royal sister, attends a peace conference with Portugal. Among other things, Nzinga demands that all Ndongo notables return to their former loyalty to Ndongo instead of Portugal. In return she would release Portuguese prisoners of war. The Portuguese agreed and immediatly broke the treaty by invading Kongo.

1623: Ann Nzinga becomes Queen and began making regional alliances to fight the Portuguese. She even made peace with the Jaga.

1624: Ndongo declared a free country

1629: Queen Ann Nzinga's forces and her allies capture Matamba from the Portuguese.


Conclusion: The battles fought between Kongo and Portugal are really telling. The Portuguese were not an invading force by any means. By 1622, when the Portuguese break the peace treaty, they had already been living in Kongo (Angola) for 140 years! Both sides knew each other very well and the Portuguese by no means ran over Ann Nzinga's forces. The Queen's army likely had gunpower weapons as well, so technologically both sides were even. Make no mistake, the Kongolese ran Portugal out of their country... they beat them. This shows a major shortcoming of Portugal, a country that was always a powerful naval Empire, not one with that strong of a land army. They were also still a minority, despite years of intermarriage (through choice or rape). This should not come as a surpirse though, early Portuguese accounts talk of a highly developed Kongo Kingdom. There was a monetary system, Kongo controlled a few vassal states itself, state-constructed roads with tolls, and the original Kongo Kingdom was the size of France and Germany combined! There were many ironsmiths in Kongo long before Portuguese contact who forged knives, weapons, and axes. They manufactured various textiles on par with those from Italy including satins, silks, taffeta, and velvet. The Portuguese didn't really bring anything to the table other than religion and maybe some crops Kongo didn't have access to from America. Other than that, I'd say Portugal's intentions were always malicious and Kongolese monarchs were mostly kept out of the loop it seems and told what they were doing was good. It seems though that many Portuguese got comfortable in Kongo and possibly a little envious. This is important to note when talking about slavery. African kingdoms (I'll talk about Benin next who also had contact with Portugal, but not on the same level as Kongo) did trade slaves to Europeans, but this was done under the powerful and deceitful arm of the Inquisition! That was the whole point of converting the leaders of nations like Kongo and Benin and not so much the people (as I'm sure there was a lot of resistance). It was to lock them into the Inquistional system. Religion was used by Europe as a control mechanism. Portugal basically wrote the book on how to conquer Africa. There's a reason the Scramble didn't occur until the 1880's. It took European powers hundreds of years through cultural (religious) influence and other destablizing measures (such as throwing African economies into depressions and pitting rival groups against each other) to soften Africa up before Europe was able to colonize en masse in the late 19th century! During the time of Kongo/Portugal relations, there were still too many powerful African empires that could hold their own and Europe was no where near as technologically advanced as they were during the late 19th century.

Cool lil timeline this dude on egyptsearch put together.
 

GoldTeef

Sarranid Bleu
Joined
Feb 28, 2015
Messages
6,230
Reputation
-1,565
Daps
17,145
Reppin
Fooglies
Someone should really make a Kongo Kingdom movie or Queen Nzinga movie.
An african movie in these times would turn out pretty bad.

If they were to make a movie set in the Kongo kingdom today the main character would be a white portugese man and the congolese people would be a bunch of stereotypes(i.e. noble savage, helpless colored, etc.), africans could make the film but let's be honest, most african films look :flabbynsick: to westerners

And the movie would probably bomb because no one has any interest in african history or culture outside of Egypt, the reaction to a trailer would be 'the kongo what, kingdom? What the fukk is that?' and a big reason for this is because the vast majority of people believe that africans have no history, that africans were neolithic hunter gatherers before the white man came to the dark continent and introduced the ungrateful savages to civilization. Don't believe me? Listen to the former president of France..


To get more people interested in african culture and history we should write books, and things that appeal to young people and adults, things like these
Marlon James’s Next Book Will Be an ‘African Game of Thrones’
A Lord of the Rings-inspired space opera wants to reconnect people with African mythology

edit: if you're offended by anything I said please let me know before you ban me so i can explain what I meant:whoa:
 
Last edited:

MajorVitaman

Superstar
Joined
Aug 26, 2015
Messages
6,483
Reputation
3,170
Daps
34,909
Reppin
#ByrdGang (formerly Eastcoastnaga)
Interesting.

And you said...



People including so-called African scholars need to get this, besides Northwest Africa/the Maghreb there was never any successful Arab military invasion of Africa. Africans were never this weak feeble people who were always getting conquered throughout history and it pisses me off that some so called African scholars promote this. Outside of Northwest Africa, the only attempted one was that of the Sudan and it was called the Dongola wars(maybe @Misreeya can inform us more) and trust me in that war the Arabs got their asses kicked badly. That was the only attempted Arab military "invasion" outside of Northwest Africa.

Any Arab slavery was due to c00nish Muslim Africans trading other Africans to the Arabs. Again outside of Northwest Africa there was NEVR any other occupied Arab area of Africa.

But more importantly even if there were Arab invasions it has NOTHING, NADA, ZERO to do with the origins of Bantu people migrating to modern day Angola. The origins of Bantu people in Angola and the DRC traces their roots back to the Bantu Migration which most believe was from Southeast Nigeria and Cameroon, those two areas having zero Arab influence even till this day.

Thanks for clearing that up fam
:salute:
**EDIT**

to clear up where my train of thought was. I was not trying to make it seem like they were Muslim. I thought since they weren't arabized I was thinking maybe they migrated to avoid Arabic persecution & enslavement since it was around the same time period.
 
Last edited:

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,413
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,496
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
Thanks for clearing that up fam
:salute:
**EDIT**

to clear up where my train of thought was. I was not trying to make it seem like they were Muslim. I thought since they weren't arabized I was thinking maybe they migrated to avoid Arabic persecution & enslavement since it was around the same time period.

The Bantu migration was MUCH earlier than that.
 

Misreeya

Pro
Joined
Jun 13, 2015
Messages
1,663
Reputation
-90
Daps
2,135
Reppin
Sudan/New Zealand.
Interesting.

And you said...



People including so-called African scholars need to get this, besides Northwest Africa/the Maghreb there was never any successful Arab military invasion of Africa. Africans were never this weak feeble people who were always getting conquered throughout history and it pisses me off that some so called African scholars promote this. Outside of Northwest Africa, the only attempted one was that of the Sudan and it was called the Dongola wars(maybe @Misreeya can inform us more) and trust me in that war the Arabs got their asses kicked badly. That was the only attempted Arab military "invasion" outside of Northwest Africa.

Any Arab slavery was due to c00nish Muslim Africans trading other Africans to the Arabs. Again outside of Northwest Africa there was NEVR any other occupied Arab area of Africa.

But more importantly even if there were Arab invasions it has NOTHING, NADA, ZERO to do with the origins of Bantu people migrating to modern day Angola. The origins of Bantu people in Angola and the DRC traces their roots back to the Bantu Migration which most believe was from Southeast Nigeria and Cameroon, those two areas having zero Arab influence even till this day.


You are talking about the Christian period, correct. The three Christian kingdom of Nobatia(North Sudan, and Upper Egypt), Makuria(North Sudan) Alodia(Central Sudan), there are dispute by the last one whether they were independent or ruled by what is not Ethiopia.

MEDIEVAL NUBIA
Makuria - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,413
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,496
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
You are talking about the Christian period, correct. The three Christian kingdom of Nobatia(North Sudan, and Upper Egypt), Makuria(North Sudan) Alodia(Central Sudan), there are dispute by the last one whether they were independent or ruled by what is not Ethiopia.

MEDIEVAL NUBIA
Makuria - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yeah I'm referring to the Christian period when they gave the Arabs one of the most brutal beatings and TWICE...
 

MajorVitaman

Superstar
Joined
Aug 26, 2015
Messages
6,483
Reputation
3,170
Daps
34,909
Reppin
#ByrdGang (formerly Eastcoastnaga)

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,413
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,496
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
Emanuele_Ne_Vunda_Sala_dei_Corazzieri_Palazzo_Ducale.jpg
tumblr_mdz57ukdlM1r9e4kjo1_500.jpg

Emanuele Ne Vunda (died 1608), also Antonio Emanuele Ne Vunda, or Antonio Emmanuele Funta, the ambassador from Congo, sent by the king of Congo Alvaro II to Pope Paul V in 1604–1608Ne-Vunda traveled through Brazil and Spain and only reached Rome on 3 January 1608, but he died two days later of illness.
 
Top