lets say austin and the rock joined TNA

mr x

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,576
Reputation
2,872
Daps
24,669
right now if those 2 joined TNA(hypothetically of course)

1. would yall start watching it like you watch wwe?

2.what effect would it have on TNA?
 

Larry

...
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
14,544
Reputation
3,072
Daps
49,887
no effect. people watch wwe on instinct, not because of who's there. if cena turned up in tna, wwe would still be the company, and tna still wouldn't be shyt.

jeff hardy was on cena's level during his last run with the e. no one can deny that. his merch was selling godly amounts, people were paying to see him, etc. he could return to the WWE tomorrow and EASILY be the 2nd biggest name in the company, ahead of Punk and right below Cena. however, once he showed up in tna, he simply didnt matter anymore. I bet millions of kids around the world who watch WWE regularly don't even realize Hardy is still wrestling. they probably think the match with Punk was his last.

the e makes those nikkas, not the other way around. vince :wow:
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
125,684
Reputation
8,907
Daps
148,725
Reppin
Westcoast
Never would be possible. Rock or Austin would create their own company from the bottom up with their connections if anything.
 

Ill Lou Malnati

Be Well.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
27,597
Reputation
2,803
Daps
68,572
Supposing it did happen, outside of a few weeks worth of TV ratings and a month or two of a bump in buy rates, it wouldn't matter.

You'd think a company that has names like Hulk Hogan, Ric Flair, Kurt Angle, Jeff Hardy, RVD, Sting and talent like Styles, Daniels, Aries, MCMG, etc. would do better and have more recognition but they don't and they can't change it because of who owns the company and who is running the company. Rock & Austin wouldn't benefit TNA in the long-run because booking can't back them up and their huge paychecks probably would finally put the company under.

It's all about brand perception these days for the most part, who is on the roster is almost irrelevant. You can swap rosters and the majority of the people are still going to stick with whatever's branded a WWE show. TNA & WWE are in the same place they are always going to be in, nothing is ever going to change that.


And why the fukk is this guy on the roster page? http://www.impactwrestling.com/roster/Wrestler-Roster/item/2920-Mark-Haskins

Isn't he the one that has had only 2 or 3 matches and nearly killed himself in all of them?
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
194,524
Reputation
25,706
Daps
626,807
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
WWE the brand is still bigger than those two especially now that neither of them could go full time.

If they appeared on a consistent basis I could see TNA's ratings bumping up from 1.1's to maybe 1.7's... 2.0 on a GOOD week.

Minimal effect.
 

I-Hate-You

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
30,817
Reputation
2,993
Daps
63,798
TNA already has Austin. And you should be watching because of that, fakkits.
 
Top