lets say austin and the rock joined TNA

mr x

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,576
Reputation
2,860
Daps
24,657
right now if those 2 joined TNA(hypothetically of course)

1. would yall start watching it like you watch wwe?

2.what effect would it have on TNA?
 

Larry

Indiana's Finest
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
13,826
Reputation
2,803
Daps
47,661
no effect. people watch wwe on instinct, not because of who's there. if cena turned up in tna, wwe would still be the company, and tna still wouldn't be shyt.

jeff hardy was on cena's level during his last run with the e. no one can deny that. his merch was selling godly amounts, people were paying to see him, etc. he could return to the WWE tomorrow and EASILY be the 2nd biggest name in the company, ahead of Punk and right below Cena. however, once he showed up in tna, he simply didnt matter anymore. I bet millions of kids around the world who watch WWE regularly don't even realize Hardy is still wrestling. they probably think the match with Punk was his last.

the e makes those nikkas, not the other way around. vince :wow:
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
122,983
Reputation
8,332
Daps
145,341
Reppin
Westcoast
Never would be possible. Rock or Austin would create their own company from the bottom up with their connections if anything.
 

Ill Lou Malnati

Be Well.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
27,597
Reputation
2,770
Daps
68,557
Supposing it did happen, outside of a few weeks worth of TV ratings and a month or two of a bump in buy rates, it wouldn't matter.

You'd think a company that has names like Hulk Hogan, Ric Flair, Kurt Angle, Jeff Hardy, RVD, Sting and talent like Styles, Daniels, Aries, MCMG, etc. would do better and have more recognition but they don't and they can't change it because of who owns the company and who is running the company. Rock & Austin wouldn't benefit TNA in the long-run because booking can't back them up and their huge paychecks probably would finally put the company under.

It's all about brand perception these days for the most part, who is on the roster is almost irrelevant. You can swap rosters and the majority of the people are still going to stick with whatever's branded a WWE show. TNA & WWE are in the same place they are always going to be in, nothing is ever going to change that.


And why the fukk is this guy on the roster page? http://www.impactwrestling.com/roster/Wrestler-Roster/item/2920-Mark-Haskins

Isn't he the one that has had only 2 or 3 matches and nearly killed himself in all of them?
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
179,385
Reputation
22,444
Daps
586,446
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
WWE the brand is still bigger than those two especially now that neither of them could go full time.

If they appeared on a consistent basis I could see TNA's ratings bumping up from 1.1's to maybe 1.7's... 2.0 on a GOOD week.

Minimal effect.
 

I-Hate-You

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
30,817
Reputation
2,940
Daps
63,793
TNA already has Austin. And you should be watching because of that, fakkits.
 
Top