from your own link ( the first one) 
bunch of smart dumb ninjas
Lets Learn About Homosexuality
- Thread starter Dirty_Jerz
- Start date
from your own link ( the first one) bunch of smart dumb ninjas
Julius Skrrvin
I be winkin' through the scope
That is from 2000. Advances in cellular, molecular biology, immunology and phylogenetic reconstructions (evolutionary trees) have led us to believe that HIV is in fact an analogue of a simian virus.the dude is who is a doctor himself is quoting doctors, studies , scientist, zoologist, etc etc, only reason i dropped that link is because is precisely for that because it give you many legit sources to look up yourself
Lots of people discover things and then go on to fukk up completely and advocate some wild shyt. For example I love some of Dawkins' work in evolutionary science but his religious and militant atheist writing is fukking terrible. That means absolutely nothing to me. Some of the brightest scientists, inventors, and engineers had some wonky theories and ideas. Its about whether they last, prove useful, and stand up to peer review that makes them relevant.
the dude who co discovered aids said it himself
Luc Montagnier - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
o wait that right am supposed to believe YOU who say it comes from bushmen have sex with monkeys and eating there meat instead of the dude who co-discovered it
That dudes advocating some serious homeopathic bullshyt too, sad really (dna teleportation
)Why are you so offended by the idea that HIV came from Africa?
I still stand by the notion that grade school is too soon....high school would be more appropriate when puberty and sexuality are becoming prevalent in people.
But i don't want my kid learning anything of a sexual nature IN SCHOOL until they are getting old enough to understand it. Middle schoolish...but a Gay course would be like a human sexuality course and that can turn into college level stuff so yeah...in high school i see no issue with it....anything sooner than that is just inappropriate.
But i don't want my kid learning anything of a sexual nature IN SCHOOL until they are getting old enough to understand it. Middle schoolish...but a Gay course would be like a human sexuality course and that can turn into college level stuff so yeah...in high school i see no issue with it....anything sooner than that is just inappropriate.
That is from 2000. Advances in cellular, molecular biology, immunology and phylogenetic reconstructions (evolutionary trees) have led us to believe that HIV is in fact an analogue of a simian virus.
Lots of people discover things and then go on to fukk up completely and advocate some wild shyt. For example I love some of Dawkins' work in evolutionary science but his religious and militant atheist writing is fukking terrible. That means absolutely nothing to me. Some of the brightest scientists, inventors, and engineers had some wonky theories and ideas. Its about whether they last, prove useful, and stand up to peer review that makes them relevant.
That dudes advocating some serious homeopathic bullshyt too, sad really (dna teleportation
Why are you so offended by the idea that HIV came from Africa?
same reason u seem so offended it came from white homosexual males
Julius Skrrvin
I be winkin' through the scope
AIDS is caused by HIV. AIDS is not a virus. There is nothing wrong with what they said. They said HIV-1 is unknown in their background and then used sequencing to FIND which viruses are related. You cant read. Not white or homosexual. And seeing as how half my family is from Africa, you can throw yourself in the bushes.
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
So prolific. I hate seeing friends become windup dolls for rubbish.
Not white or homosexual. And seeing as how half my family is from Africa, you can throw yourself in the bushes.
one more time
The human AIDS viruses human immunode®ciency virus type 1
(HIV-1) and type 2 (HIV-2) represent cross-species (zoonotic)
infections
1±4
. Although the primate reservoir of HIV-2 has been
clearly identi®ed as the sooty mangabey (Cercocebus atys)
2,4±7
, the
origin of HIV-1 remains uncertain
The origin of the HUMAN aids virus (HIV-1) REMAINS UNCERTAIN.
you dropped the link to prove some connection of it coming from your monkey sex theory , when the science it telling you the origin of the HUMAN virus in unknown.
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
Do alot of you friends think its ideal for your son to be educated by a man in a dress who has used alchemy and technosorcery to turn himself to what he is not. Frankenqueen? I dont agree like no.
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
Are you illiterate? Your own quote makes the case quite clear, so read it again. There are 2 types of HIV. BOTH affect humans. They already know exactly which monkeys HIV-2 comes from (soota mangabey.) They are still looking for the reservoir of HIV-1. That doesn't mean they have no idea where it might have come from and that it's a totally open question. It means that there are several possible scenarios but none have been supported conclusively at the expense of the others.
In other words, we already know for a fact that one of the strains comes from a particular kind of monkey, yet you want to claim there is no possible connection between the other strain and non-human primates.
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
Are you illiterate? Your own quote makes the case quite clear, so read it again. There are 2 types of HIV. BOTH affect humans. They already know exactly which monkeys HIV-2 comes from (soota mangabey.) They are still looking for the reservoir of HIV-1. That doesn't mean they have no idea where it might have come from and that it's a totally open question. It means that there are several possible scenarios but none have been supported conclusively at the expense of the others.
So you agree totally that hiv is not man made.
Julius Skrrvin
I be winkin' through the scope
IN THIS VERY THREAD i explained to you how antigenic shift and mutations of strains happen.
History of HIV/AIDS - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Do you understand what this means? It is not saying that WE KNOW EXACTLY where this (HIV-1) came from. It means that phylogenetic comparisons and DNA/molecular evidence indicate that analogous SIV viruses existed in HIV epicenters in Africa. You can't pinpoint the exact emergence of any virus. We were barely able to isolate source of the possible next flu epidemics in swine and avian viruses, and that is in fact due to the global awareness from AIDS and epidemiology. The fact is, that HIV strains have actual evidence and argumentation for being linked to monkey virii in africa. And your mechanism is that 'gays created AIDS'. Yes, homosexuals spread HIV in america along with IV drug users. Anal sex has a higher chance of HIV transmission than penile and vaginal sex, and most gays in the 80s werent using condoms or protection for obvious reasons (they couldnt get pregnant). I dont deny that at all. What I do deny is your lack of a better source for HIV. Even the scientists who deny it are primarily citing the lack of a specific emergence event. And that is nigh impossible in a 3rd world country.
Are you illiterate? Your own quote makes the case quite clear, so read it again. There are 2 types of HIV. BOTH affect humans. They already know exactly which monkeys HIV-2 comes from (soota mangabey.) They are still looking for the reservoir of HIV-1. That doesn't mean they have no idea where it might have come from and that it's a totally open question. It means that there are several possible scenarios but none have been supported conclusively at the expense of the others.
In other words, we already know for a fact that one of the strains comes from a particular kind of monkey, yet you want to claim there is no possible connection between the other strain and non-human primates.
yea no , totally make sense now, thanks for clearing that up. :shake:
I dont think he wants to understand this.
Its very demonic friend, they want young children of color to grow up think that there motherland is the root of one of the most devastating diseases in human history. Since they want to teach about history why dont they teach this
U.S. apologizes for syphilis experiment in Guatemala | Reuters
Just one of many examples , you know uh not saying anything that like would ever be permitted in Africa, i mean these are scientist after all.
Julius Skrrvin
I be winkin' through the scope
Just one of many examples , you know uh not saying anything that like would ever be permitted in Africa, i mean these are scientist after all.
It is so bad that one debilitating disease came from Africa? What about all the diseases that came from europe and asia? The Spanish flu was worse than HIV ever was at its peak. The black plague? and the subsequent plagues it caused in Asia ? What about the various pandemics europeans caused by bringing measles, smallpox, and influenzas to new world populations everywhere? And killing off tons of native populations as a result? And I learned all about that in high school.
You are so basic. I don't even dislike you anymore, I just feel bad that you seem to have such an inferiority complex you would rather disregard all research and evidence because your feelings are hurt.