Lets have a look at Jeff Jarret's TNA Reign Of Terror

Coco Brown

All Star
Joined
Nov 12, 2017
Messages
2,059
Reputation
540
Daps
8,757
This was the main thing that cooled me off TNA during this time. He's just not someone I enjoy. To me Jeff Jarrett is an upper mid card dude at best. Those long ass title reigns of his were draining.

Man... Monty was such a big missed opportunity. He should have been next.
 

julesocean

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
7,878
Reputation
2,036
Daps
18,573
Double J's reign of terror was definitely worse than HHH's but he was surrounded with a lot more quality stuff around his reign (X Division, tag division) than what was going on during HHH's run in WWE at the same time.

And at least Trips was a better worker and more of a star than Jarrett.
 

Reality Check

Keepin' it 100
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
15,191
Reputation
1,980
Daps
50,277
Been saying this on here for years that Jarrett's reign of terror is easily worse than Triple H's. Low Key, the InCenarator Era could make a case for being a top 3 reign of terror.
 

Bonefan32

Superstar
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
16,002
Reputation
4,209
Daps
44,463
The same channel made one about New Jack TNA run,looks like it was very entertaining

Sounds like the reason it didn't last long was Jarrett related

 
Joined
Aug 14, 2015
Messages
18,736
Reputation
1,071
Daps
49,848
The difference tho is that during the early stages of tna they didn't have any true main eventers like that.

Who was he supposed to drop the belt to? grand master sexay, d'lo brown, or xpac.:patrice:

It wasn't until around 2005 that they started really getting main event level guys.

Hhh literally hogged the spotlight when they were packed with guys like rvd, booker t, Steiner, kane, etc that were red hot.
 
Top