Oh, so you'd like for your children to be placed into little boxes defining how they're supposed to act. Why don't you just let a kid be a kid. 50 years ago Pink was for boys and Blue was for girls, gender roles change with time. People are so concerned that every little minor detail is gonna fukk a kid up. Oh no, they may not understand gender roles.i just think its bad for male/female gender roles
Yes. I have a gay uncle who has raising his niece by himself for like 5+ years now. I see no problem w/ it. I do feel sorry for gay couples that want to adopt because even if they are able to adopt it's not gonna be easy. It's hard for straight couples to adopt...it's gonna be even harder for gay couples.
There should be another spinoff thread about should single people be able to adopt (they can, it's just very hard). Whereas there is almost no legit documented evidence of there being a huge difference between being raised by gays vs straight parents, being raised by a single parent does have a lot of documented negatives.
Oh, so you'd like for your children to be placed into little boxes defining how they're supposed to act. Why don't you just let a kid be a kid. 50 years ago Pink was for boys and Blue was for girls, gender roles change with time. People are so concerned that every little minor detail is gonna fukk a kid up. Oh no, they may not understand gender roles.
How about what a human should be like? Women and men are not that different. Are all single parent kids fukked up because they didn't have "good examples" of what a woman and man should be like?i'm saying they need good examples of what a woman and man should be like
http://www.womenshealth.gov/health-topics/a-z-topic/details.cfm?pid=3002Let's see that documentation
Family Structure. Children of single parents were at higher risk of physical abuse and of all types of neglect and were overrepresented among seriously injured, moderately injured, and endangered children. Compared with their counterparts living with both parents, children in single-parent families had
a 77-percent greater risk of being harmed by physical abuse (using the stringent Harm Standard) and a 63-percent greater risk of experiencing any countable physical abuse (using the Endangerment Standard);
an 87-percent greater risk of being harmed by physical neglect and a 165-percent greater risk of experiencing any countable physical neglect;
a 74-percent greater risk of being harmed by emotional neglect and a 64-percent greater risk of experiencing any countable emotional neglect;
a 220-percent (or more than three times) greater risk of being educationally neglected;
an approximately 80-percent greater risk of suffering serious injury or harm from abuse or neglect;
an approximately 90-percent greater risk of receiving moderate injury or harm as a result of child maltreatment; and
a 120-percent (or more than two times) greater risk of being endangered by some type of child abuse or neglect.
Among children in single-parent households, those living with only their fathers were approximately one and two-thirds times more likely to be physically abused than those living with only their mothers.
For example, children from single-parent homes may be more likely to drop out of school, and they are also more vulnerable to alcohol and drug use.
Children from single-parent families had twice the incidence of psychiatric illness, suicide attempts and alcohol abuse problems compared with those from two-parent homes [source: Meikle]. Other studies have shown that kids living with single parents have lower self-esteem.
Compared to kids from two-parent families, they tend to get lower grades, suffer more absenteeism, and have more problems relating to peers and teachers. Their drop-out rate is higher, and they're less likely to attend college [source: Psychology Today]. Children raised by one parent are also more likely than their peers to exhibit problems like increased aggression and anxiety and to have trouble getting along with their parents