I'll say this... when you want to speak in terms of statistical semantics, yes, Lamar Jackson has a statistical edge over Jayden Daniels.
HOWEVER, Lamar this season has WAY WAY WAY FUCCKIN' MORE TEAM TALENT to help his stats be where they're at. Whereas, DANIELS literally had to carry the entire TEAM on his back because he has a shytty, defense, an obsolete O-line, NO SOLID RB core, ONE good receiver. And YET, the Commanders has the SAME EXACT NUMBER OF WINS AS THE RAVENS this season. Daniels had 7 GAME WINNING DRIVES, should've been EIGHT when they faced Dallas the first time, but their kicker missed the extra point!
If we're talking about one player who's has been more valuable, single-handedly turned a 4-13 team last season to be 12-5 in the regular season, the best record the team had for over 30 years, with this without any really help outside of Terry. So, yes... if we want to speak semantics and say despite all the weapons that Lamar has, he's statistically better but I strongly argue he's not miles away. I never like placing MVP SOLELY due to having a greater statistical number. I take it as who's more valuable in that the team wouldn't make it without him. For a player that had to do it all to ensure success. And I feel the ONLY reason people isn't putting Jayden into the conversation is because he's a ROOKIE doing MVP caliber stuff, but still just a ROOKIE so y'all won't acknowledge it.
