Larsa Pippen granted 50% of Scottie Pippens retirement fund and 401k.

MostReal

Bandage Hand Steph
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
24,766
Reputation
3,224
Daps
55,704
CourageousPointlessErin-size_restricted.gif
:dead:
 

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
20,501
Reputation
9,639
Daps
117,058
It's these kinda of men who clown you when you say you won't committ to a broke woman.

Invite a woman into your life when all she can bring into it is good looks, worn out puss and baggage brehs. Lmao

If a woman has her own money and doesn't need yours, there's no incentive to go after your finances in a divorce.
 

DonB90

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
9,008
Reputation
1,235
Daps
48,475
He should empty his accounts and flee to a non extradition country and renounce his citizenship.

Bribe whomever in whatever country he moves to for citizenship there and call it a wrap
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Messages
3,171
Reputation
570
Daps
14,659
No, it ain't rigged.....

The Uniform Premarital Agreement Act (UPAA) has applied to California prenups since 1986. In general, this law states that written prenuptial agreements signed by both parties, in contemplation of marriage will automatically become effective once the couple marries. An agreement can cover a couple's present and future property rights, as well as other matters related to the marriage, but it can't negatively affect a child's right to child support or take away a court's power to control child custody and visitation after marriage.
Principles of general contract law also apply to prenuptial agreements. Agreements require valid consent, meaning that a person must have the mental ability to consent, and that consent cannot be the result of fraud, inappropriate influence, or mistake.
Amendments to the UPAA that apply to California prenuptial agreements made after 2002 state that agreements will be enforced against a spouse only if that spouse:
  1. received complete information about the other spouse's property and finances prior to signing the agreement​
  2. had at least 7 days between first receiving the agreement and signing it (to allow enough time to have an attorney review the agreement), and​
  3. was represented by a separate attorney when signing the agreement, unless the spouse:​
  4. received full information in writing about the terms and basic effect of the agreement, including any rights and obligations the agreement would nullify, and​
  5. signed a separate document acknowledging receipt of such information, identifying the person who provided the information, and expressly waiving the right to an attorney.
Even if all of the above requirements are satisfied, if the spouse did not employ an independent attorney, any provision in the agreement affecting rights to future spousal support (alimony) will not be enforceable.

That’s been wrong for nearly 20 years. Barry Bond’s ex-wife failed to get a prenup thrown out on those grounds.

 

CopiousX

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Messages
11,510
Reputation
3,382
Daps
55,916
The US Court systems continue to do clown shyt like this then act surpirse when marriage rates are down and less children are being born than in the previous decades.
Justice Dept Response :

"Sounds like it's time to expand the common law system" :mjlit:
 
Top