an example would be mormonism and the writings of Joseph Smith.
You really avoided my point.
I googled that Bat Creek Stone and the current conclusion is it is a reprint, forgery to look like ancient Hebrew.@NYC Rebel @Brehvity3135 @No1 should we disregard these findings as foolishness too? I think many people would find this interesting
I didn’t say you put photo shop up. I just am not a fan of a lot of the fly by night historians I’ve seen in recent years The scholarship often seems incomplete and isnt housed on past research.Breh im familiar with the works of Ivan Van Sertima...that one of the OGs.
My point is nikkas said we talking about fairytales and I provided about a half dozen findings across multiple continents. If all y'all gonna say is "I dont do pictures " as if I personally made them shyts in photoshop just now...then imma just go back to cracking jokes in this thread.
I realize we in the sports section and not the Root or some shyt
so let me skiddadle so I dont derail this thread
That's the biggest issue with the underground historical black history realm. Most of these guys haven't done the research and had their work peer reviewed like Tariq Nasheeds Hidden Colors. That said, some have but I rarely have seen any Hebrew Israelite work peer reviewed at all. I am not going to say all of their work isn't but for the most part, it's notI don’t just do pictures. I need to read things backed by study and scholarship. Ivan Van Sertima sent his team from Rutgers where things were lab tested and analyzed, their findings peer reviewed (and hared on by racist scholars). The scholarship around those findings were sound. I have yet to see that level of scholarship in many of these new historians be on a picture and some self made content. Its lacking.
This dudes brain might be broke. Tweets from the other day: