that wasnt my point
my only issues as with the word precedent. I think of precedent as a judicial thing, not a fan getting mad and suing thing.
I wasn't arguing whether or not it set a precedent, I was disagreeing with your assertion that the settlement had anything to do with kindness.
Ultimately, a court did decide to hear this case. These cases are all designed to reach settlement so they don't need the results of a landmark case to help their side, they just need to get the courts to hear it. If more people now feel emboldened enough to introduce their own player altercations to the court, then it's hard to argue that a precedent wasn't set with this.
I think most people hearing this story immediately throw the case out as being frivolous but I never saw any footage of what actually happened. I think players should be able to safely move around during the context of the game and not be punished for any incidental contact that occurs but if it's in more of a Ron Artest/Stephen Jackson fashion, there might be a place for it in the courtroom.