I gave this crap 1:08 of my life and he's complaining for the sake of complaining. Crying over fake clauses in fake contracts. Even if you wanted to apply logic to this stuff he's still wrong.
Roman was the advertised competitor, both Braun and Bray signed the contract with the intention of facing Roman Reigns and no deadline was presented for Roman signing the contract. shyt, Roman literally said that he'd be there on Sunday and win the title
. They knew he'd be there. Those guys signed up for that shyt.
WWE has literally inserted Edge mid match in a match that had nothing to do with him contractually. That's an even worse precedent.
Rollins inserting himself into the Wrestlemania match and pinning Roman was an even larger logical gap than what happened at Payback but this guy is saying he'd understand if Roman had the MITB. If WWE was based in any form of reality and Heyman was the "advocate" he claims to be then he could (and should) have pointed out that at no point has it ever been stated that the MITB winner could choose the stipulation for the match. Rollins cashing in broke the original contract between Roman and Brock and started a new match. Roman shouldn't have played any part in that finish. But people like him overlook holes like that because they liked the moment.
If wrestling applied logic at all times then Roman wouldn't be anywhere near Heyman in the first place because Heyman's an idiot.