king of the neckbeards is mad at Roman Reigns brehs

Rell84shots

Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
41,350
Reputation
5,841
Daps
163,566
Reppin
Dallas, TX
His whole shtick is to be anti WWE & pro AEW at all times, he was never this negative about WWE before AEW debuted. I agree with his take on how awful Bliss is and how good Sasha & Montez are, but most of the time he's just playing a troll character.
Eh, I listened to the whole thing after the show last night while washing up and he wasn't mad at Roman, he was ranting at the booking decision. JD supports turning Roman heel but thinks the booking was stupid (it was stupid).

The OTT ranting is very cringe though :francis: but on-brand I guess. Not much worse than Alvarez having a bad day.
Alvarez is the GOAT when it comes to embarrassing wrestling youtubers, dude is seriously the most cringey personality there is.
 

ÆTHER

The Fifth Element
Joined
Nov 6, 2017
Messages
1,150
Reputation
970
Daps
6,843
Reppin
93 million miles above these devils
:russell: I gave this crap 1:08 of my life and he's complaining for the sake of complaining. Crying over fake clauses in fake contracts. Even if you wanted to apply logic to this stuff he's still wrong.

Roman was the advertised competitor, both Braun and Bray signed the contract with the intention of facing Roman Reigns and no deadline was presented for Roman signing the contract. shyt, Roman literally said that he'd be there on Sunday and win the title :childplease:. They knew he'd be there. Those guys signed up for that shyt.

WWE has literally inserted Edge mid match in a match that had nothing to do with him contractually. That's an even worse precedent.

Rollins inserting himself into the Wrestlemania match and pinning Roman was an even larger logical gap than what happened at Payback but this guy is saying he'd understand if Roman had the MITB. If WWE was based in any form of reality and Heyman was the "advocate" he claims to be then he could (and should) have pointed out that at no point has it ever been stated that the MITB winner could choose the stipulation for the match. Rollins cashing in broke the original contract between Roman and Brock and started a new match. Roman shouldn't have played any part in that finish. But people like him overlook holes like that because they liked the moment.

If wrestling applied logic at all times then Roman wouldn't be anywhere near Heyman in the first place because Heyman's an idiot.
 

The G.O.D II

A ha ha
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
86,339
Reputation
4,904
Daps
190,411
I'm glad I don't know who any of these wrestling dorks are. I just watch the show & not tune in to what people who use wrestling lingo in everyday life have to say about it.

I only know him because he was part of that whiny cac rage COD class like el presador and wings of redemption. I see he’s moved on to YouTube wrestling commentary and apparently is so big he’s got actual wrestlers responding to him
 

Jamal514

In high demand
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
13,459
Reputation
1,520
Daps
47,095
Reppin
Montreal
It's funny to me how everyone hated Roman now people like him because he's heel when he's literally the same boring character with Paul by his side. Give it two weeks in Wrestling nerds will turn on him like they pretty much do everyone else. :mjlol:

If he adds a moonsault and superkick to his arsenal, they’ll give him unconditional love :mjlol:
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2015
Messages
18,736
Reputation
1,071
Daps
49,848
So they turned him heel & now they love him.

Marks are extra dumb crybabies & purposely go against the grain for no reason.

Roman reigns been had the sauce, but they complained cuz he's labeled a face.

He probably still doing the same stuff he been doing as a face, but now he's bad so he's good.:beli:
 
Top