Follow SAS’s career and that’s actually a common thing he brings up. He says he felt he should have always become an attorney, and he knows if he were the prosecutor he would have gotten a conviction on OJ. He’s repeated it in interviews over a decade now. It’s something either personal about it, or maybe that moment inspired him so it’s etched in his brain. But SAS always brings that scenario up.I havent listened to a bunch of talking heads about it. But I imagine one of them "hello toms" may be directed SAS. He seemed extra with the shyt. He mentioned the sports stuff but of course talked about the trial. Said it was more on the prosecutors screwing up and having OJ trying on a glove that "obviously" shrunk. Then went so far as to say that if he was on the jury he wouldve voted to convict OJ because it was obvious he did it or something like that. SAS has decades of experience, he couldve easily framed shyt in a neutral way but it's obvious he wanted to kick OJ's back in.