Kevin Samuels Discussion Thread

qashif

All Star
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
3,363
Reputation
430
Daps
11,892
ClearcutVariableGoat-max-1mb.gif
 

Brolic

High Value Poster
Joined
Jul 18, 2018
Messages
12,943
Reputation
10,848
Daps
131,031
Reppin
Maryland
Vlad: So Kevin! When you were pointing your camera at “Sixthegoddis, what did you mean by “receipts shown”?

“What’s your relationship with T.I. ?

“I see you have quite a few mugshots, what’s the backstory?”

Did you have a father in the house when you were growing up?

Did you do anything illegal before you became a YouTuber?

What do you think about the whole Tekashi 69 situation? Is he a high value male?
 

Wiseborn

Superstar
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
25,039
Reputation
1,995
Daps
55,691
I really need a stat for this
The child support system kind of proves this wrong
The child support system shows the alpha seed beta need thing. Granted I'd need to see stats on this but whoever is on the birth certificate is the father and I read that up to 30% of CS cases involved dudes that wasn't the biological father.
 

O.Red

Veteran
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
18,113
Reputation
5,517
Daps
72,286
Reppin
NULL
I have to be honest. I belong to a big shoe group on Facebook. I enjoy the jays and all that. I don’t buy like I did in my youth. But I enjoy looking at them.

I’ve noticed in this group there are guys in there 30’s, 40’s and 50’s dressing like they are 22. And the thing is I’m not talking about 2 or 3 outfits. Some of These brehs are outchea like Instagram thots

Posting 10 pics in a row with 10 different fits to match 10 different jays. All with Instagram thot quotes to go with them. “To walk a mile in my shoes you better get your money up”. Etc.


I am looking at them like :francis:
One of the issues in these discussions is nikkas often conflate immaturity with tackiness

Your post is describing tacky behavior and tacky has no age limit

Overly matching colors like what your post describes is an example
 
Last edited:

Wiseborn

Superstar
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
25,039
Reputation
1,995
Daps
55,691
That stat is impossible to believe


It is in modern times and if wrong would cause people to look at Kevin funny but it did happen before:

8,000 YEARS AGO, 17 WOMEN REPRODUCED FOR EVERY ONE MAN
An analysis of modern DNA uncovers a rough dating scene after the advent of agriculture.
FRANCIE DIEP
UPDATED:
JUN 14, 2017
ORIGINAL:
MAR 17, 2015
Melissa Wilson Sayres, a computational biologist at Arizona State University, and a member of a group of scientists who uncovered this moment in prehistory by analyzing modern genes.

Another member of the research team, a biological anthropologist, hypothesizes that somehow, only a few men accumulated lots of wealth and power, leaving nothing for others. These men could then pass their wealth on to their sons, perpetuating this pattern of elitist reproductive success. Then, as more thousands of years passed, the numbers of men reproducing, compared to women, rose again. "Maybe more and more people started being successful," Wilson Sayres says. In more recent history, as a global average, about four or five women reproduced for every one man.

evolve to digest milk, for example, while most ethnic Tibetans have adaptations to deal with the lower oxygen levels at high altitudes. But if Wilson Sayres' team's hypothesis is correct, it would be one of the first instances that scientists have found of culture affecting human evolution.

The team uncovered this dip-and-rise in the male-to-female reproductive ratio by looking at DNA from more than 450 volunteers from seven world regions. Geneticists analyzed two parts of the DNA, Y-chromosome DNA and mitochondrial DNA. These don't make up a large portion of a person's genetics, but they're special because people inherit Y-chromosome DNA exclusively from their male ancestors and mitochondrial DNA exclusively from their female ancestors. By analyzing diversity in these parts, scientists are able to deduce the numbers of female and male ancestors a population has. It's always more female.

"IT WASN'T LIKE THERE WAS A MASS DEATH OF MALES. THEY WERE THERE, SO WHAT WERE THEY DOING?"
So much for what our DNA can tell us. This study, published last week in the journal Genome Research, can't directly account for why the dip occurred. Instead, the team members tried to think through other explanations. "Like was there some sort of weird virus that only affected males across the whole globe, 8,000 years ago?" Wilson Sayres asks—a hypothesis the team found unlikely.

To further test the wealth-and-power idea, the researchers plan to look for other genetic markers that would indicate that something cultural, not physical, kept those early male farmers from reproducing. Team members could also collaborate with anthropologists and archaeologists, to see if they have any clues.

Nature is a harsh taskmaster, but so, it seems, is human culture. Although the popular notion is that farming and settlement cushioned people against "survival of the fittest," this study shows that's not true. Something cultural happened 8,000 years ago that's marked us even today.

Quick Studies is an award-winning series that sheds light on new research and discoveries that change the way we look at the world.
 

Wiseborn

Superstar
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
25,039
Reputation
1,995
Daps
55,691
Are you trying to destroy the world :pachaha:


Well when that happened in the past it did make white people whiter.

As you know white people evolved from Black people and neaderthals. There's a reason for light skin but there's no biological reason for Blond hair and blue eyes.

 

Wiseborn

Superstar
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
25,039
Reputation
1,995
Daps
55,691
Going off my immediate family

my gma had 3 sons. Only 1 had kids (2 kids)

she has 5 grand sons. Only two had kids totaling 5.

so out my gma 8 sons/grandsons.

3 had kids totaling 7


This seems more likely, Not 18% having all the kids especially not back in the day but It may come into fruition with Generation Z. When I was a kid in the 90% Teenage pregnancy was a moral panic. Even back then it seemed that the fathers of these babies weren't mainly teenage boys but grown ass men.

I had a GF that took up with a dude that she said was 26 when she was 16. By the time I turned 18 dating a girl under 18 was totally frowned upon.

Now there's another moral panic about teen and young adult dudes being masterbating incels obsessed with video games.
 
Top