Why does Undertaker have to be there thoughNash: Who would you put in those positions? You going to put Finn [Balor] in there versus The Undertaker? [Seth] Rollins? Who are you going to put?
He said Eddie Guerrero and Chris Benoit we’re going to kill the business dead 15 years ago. Now guys are making more than he ever did. What gives?
WWE did it though, and the company didn’t die. They put Chris Jericho on top on multiple occasions and didn’t adversely affect them either.
WCW putting the same guys in the main event did end the ratings war. Perhaps working Benoit, Guerrero and Jericho in earlier would have warded off WWF’s catching up. The events that sank WCW for good was the finger poke of doom going back to Hogan as champ, and the Hogan Flair double turn that spring. Hell WWE put the belt on Rey Mysterio at a wrestlemania and gave him big money to bring him back. Nash is wrong, unless we’re going with the idea Vince don’t know how to make $.
And my interest in wrestling started to end when those were on top. What gives?
Nash is right as always
Oh please. They were given their break after the war ended.
My Lord :DeadHenry:In hindsight, I guess I was right in the sense of them killing something.
Roman Reigns is alright as a wrestler, but what's his character other than "I'm Roman Reigns"?
So either you don't have a character, or if you do, you're busy in infinite repeat 50/50 booking.
What's wrong with being rey back?How come Vince McMahon is giving Rey Mysterio millions of dollars and bringing him back as a superstar and legend in 2018, while Bischoff thought he was an opening match gimmick. Who was correct?
What's wrong with being rey back?