in what though?
Being a complete package of a woman. I have a huge girlcrush on her so I might be biased.
in what though?
You just can't help yourself with the offbase rockhead analogies..
Chanel was a high fashion french Couturière.. Kim Kardashian sells her clothes at Sears...
Kim Kardashian wears Chanel....Chanel wouldn't be caught dead wearing Kardashian clothing...
More of what kind of women tho? You guys need to specify with this because no woman with class wants to emulate Kim and most women would rather dress like Michelle than Kim anyday. That's why when Michelle co-signs a store or clothing, it sales out because the modern day mom and professional woman would rather look more to her for fashion then they would look to Kim but because you guys only seem to pay attention to the ratchet aspect of fashion all you see are Kim clones.
1st...You don't know what quantifiable means.. Might wanna try using another word...Nope... It's still more quantifiable impact on fashion than some dress Michelle wore on election night.
1st...You don't know what quantifiable means.. Might wanna try using another word...
2nd.. Kim is not even the biggest fashion icon of her era.. That would be Rihanna...
tf do you think he meant by who belongs in vogue????? or is most influential style wise? if you wanna dress like Michelle ol granny ass, thats coo, but I would be hella pissed if my girl dressed like that at a reception.
well honestly kim k got the better packageBeing a complete package of a woman. I have a huge girlcrush on her so I might be biased.
well honestly kim k got the better package
what other package are u referring to ?
I'm not making completely idiotic statements like the one you just made. You just made a generalized statement based on no kind of evidence other than your ego and bias.
show me street walkers that wear Givenchy dresses.Vogue is not about being pretty, it's about being fashionable.
Kim is fashionable for women who like to dress like streetwalkers, that's not vogue.
1-Kim is not a bigger fashion icon than Rihanna or MichelleThe question was not whether or not Kim was the biggest fashion icon. People were debating who looks better, who is more accomplished and who is a bigger fashion icon between Kim and Michelle. Outside of ambiguous statements, you haven't provided anything in Michelle's favor.
1-Kim is not a bigger fashion icon than Rihanna or Michelle
2-Kim looks better than Michelle
3-Michelle is more accomplished than Kim
4-"ambiguous" is yet another word that you dont know the definition of
we talking about credentials????I'm no longer engaging with you lmao.