Kaepernick has filed a lawsuit against the NFL. Edit: Kaepernick trying to blow the system up.Salute

JLova

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
58,349
Reputation
4,121
Daps
175,444
Of course he said that, he isn't going to go on national television and say we have no case. The closest thing to this is the barry bonds case were the mlb obviously colluded to keep him out of the mlb. A pattern is not enough and he has to show that the teams came together to decide not to sign him not that teams independently came to the conclusion not to sign him. This is a hail mary pass, he has a chance to win but it is extremely slim.

They have their smoking gun.
 

nightwing2016

All Star
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
5,117
Reputation
640
Daps
8,542
They have their smoking gun.

He said i predict we will have our smoking gun. hopefully, they do though because if the statement he made is what they are going into arbitration with they are going to lose because patterns of owners telling team executives not to hire someone or less talented individuals being hired over him does not prove collusion based on the nfl cba.
 

Akata Man Bromo

Still learning....
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,425
Reputation
12,548
Daps
133,740
Reppin
Dade/Broward
DMa_nHyXcAES_v6.jpg
@PhonZhi was right :wow:
 

Pimp

Banned
Joined
Sep 28, 2012
Messages
13,717
Reputation
-1,859
Daps
32,718
Reppin
NULL
He said i predict we will have our smoking gun. hopefully, they do though because if the statement he made is what they are going into arbitration with they are going to lose because patterns of owners telling team executives not to hire someone or less talented individuals being hired over him does not prove collusion based on the nfl cba.

It has already been proven.. Most people don't know shyt about the law.
 

nightwing2016

All Star
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
5,117
Reputation
640
Daps
8,542
It has already been proven.. Most people don't know shyt about the law.

I work for a constitutional law think tank and have spoken to a number of labor lawyers about this since his collusion claim was filed. So i know a little about the law but please inform me how it has already been proven
 

Originalman

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
47,127
Reputation
12,150
Daps
204,800
Craig Hodges did the same thing

Yep sure did. Thanks for reminding me brotha.

Like I have said before on here the NFL don't give a shyt. No league maybe in all of sports in the world has the political ties that the NFL has (basically because it is in the most powerful country in the world).

It took 6 years of court cases just for the NFL to agree to pay past players money for CTE and other injuries.

Took NFL players like Reggie White and others to sue to league just for free agency and even then the league just paid the players in damages and lawyer fees.

shyt the league can say hey we guilty and pay kap a couple of million in damages. Give him a token try out and still fukk him over on a roster spot in the preseason.

The League just does not care.......that is one of the reasons they suck at PR.

I said before that they could have slowly phased Kap out and no one would have said shyt. They could have signed kap put him in a backup role and phased him out in 2 years like the NBA did abdul rauf. Hell in the offseason kap said he was even gonna stand this year if he got a gig.

The NFL is just so powerful they don't care about PR and that is why every few years they have some sort of scandal and tell folks to kiss they ass and keep trucking.
 
Last edited:

nightwing2016

All Star
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
5,117
Reputation
640
Daps
8,542
Lawyers take cases all the time but that don't mean they will win.


Like somebody said Barry Bonds sued MLB for collusion and lost

Not only that, their is more to taking a case besides winning and losing, lawyers take case that they will probably not win due to the high profile of the case. Marketability is a huge part of being a defense lawyer if you are not working in the public sector and this pending arbitration is going to be in the public consciousness for some time. So if he loses he is still remembered as the lawyer that fought the monstrous NFL who violated the rights of Kaep but fell short due to the odds and if he wins he will be seen as the Lawyer who defeated the NFL. He does not lose here either way, his profile dramatically increases from this.
 

nightwing2016

All Star
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
5,117
Reputation
640
Daps
8,542
I don't think Garragos would take a case knowing he wouldn't win would he.He knows how the NFL shield is in court.

This is arbitration, not court their is a difference. Arbitration is dictated by the NFL CBA and also Kaep is going to have to show that 14 or more teams conspired against him to end the cba but only two or more to win his claim.
 

Big Boss

Veteran
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
175,456
Reputation
12,117
Daps
342,059
Reppin
NULL
Not only that, their is more to taking a case besides winning and losing, lawyers take case that they will probably not win due to the high profile of the case. Marketability is a huge part of being a defense lawyer if you are not working in the public sector and this pending arbitration is going to be in the public consciousness for some time. So if he loses he is still remembered as the lawyer that fought the monstrous NFL who violated the rights of Kaep but fell short due to the odds and if he wins he will be seen as the Lawyer who defeated the NFL. He does not lose here either way, his profile dramatically increases from this.


Facts
 
Top