K Michelle Tho

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,449
Daps
246,378
By *WHOM*. I know some of yall favorite term is "Name names" I call it how I see it. I've pointed out time and again some fugazi's in threads.

Don't quote me and put the weight of the coli on my shoulders. I literally just quoted myself calling out another fake in another thread.

What *really* is the point other than bothering me about issues yall have with other posters?

I wasn't gone say shyt til you said its real :manny:
 

At30wecashout

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
36,462
Reputation
18,463
Daps
166,844
I wasn't gone say shyt til you said its real :manny:
:dahell:I said im *fairly* certain. I could be wrong, but she does not have a body I haven't seen before, in person, on REAL women. No, its not 1 in 10, or 1 in 20, or even 1 in 30 women walking around like this,

but I see it all the time. I could hit the beach up tomorrow and show examples if I wanted to be a lifeless fukk. If people got a problem, why not quote Gravity? Acewonders? Silkk? Living Proof? Da President? Or any of the other people

on the first page who said the *same* thing I did. In case you didn't notice, I randomly get quoted by this pest on some bullshyt. There is no point. I get targeted.

:camby:Don't encourage that bullshyt. I'm not gonna sit her going through my own posting history disproving this stuff. People wanna get dirt? Do the homework.
 

Tae

All Star
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
2,536
Reputation
520
Daps
5,468
In addition



:rocky:Why weren't these quoted? You even dapped one. Quit buggin.

Notice how you responded about this chick and the way you responded about K. Michelle. :sas1:
You essentially said she's had work done but she's still okay, you flat out called K. Michelle unattractive.
Why be so harsh on one woman and give another woman a pass? :mjpls:
I dap posts I agree with and call out hypocrisy when I see it. That's all. :yeshrug:
 

At30wecashout

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
36,462
Reputation
18,463
Daps
166,844
Notice how you responded about this chick and the way you responded about K. Michelle. :sas1:
You essentially said she's had work done but she's still okay, you flat out called K. Michelle unattractive.
Why be so harsh on one woman and give another woman a pass? :mjpls:
I dap posts I agree with and call out hypocrisy when I see it. That's all. :yeshrug:
:dahell:Harsh? I'm a no-name on the internet. K Michelle has fake body parts and a bad attitude. I know more about her than the other chick, and its all unattractive.

I posted two messages in that thread, said I wouldn't remember her in 5 minutes, and sure enough, until you tagged me in this mess,I forgot. So what you are saying is:jbhmm: I have to have absolutely

the same response to every phony, even if they have totally different circumstances?

I said the other chick was ok. Did I say fine? Did I say bad? I said ok. The most lukewarm of designations, only because her face wasn't totally tragic.

I got in here and watched a video of a mother running topless through what looks to be a studio, with a diaper booty that barely moves, and im supposed to respond with the same

level of disregard as a lady who is simply lying about being natural????:dahell: Are you 100% serious with this assertion? Why not stop digging recently, and go back through my

long ass posting history and see what I have said about some other ladies. If you are gonna make a point, make it right, cause comparing apples to oranges ain't proving shyt.
 

At30wecashout

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
36,462
Reputation
18,463
Daps
166,844
I still don't understand why would most men fukk something that is inauthentic?
Thickness is the sickness. Its one thing to look natural and people have to wonder...its another to be super obvious and people still :noah: over it.

I'm trying to wife up someone like Phoenyx Austin:banderas:Health and real.:shaq2:So what her booty is lagging like 56k.
 

Tae

All Star
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
2,536
Reputation
520
Daps
5,468
:dahell:Harsh? I'm a no-name on the internet. K Michelle has fake body parts and a bad attitude. I know more about her than the other chick, and its all unattractive.

I posted two messages in that thread, said I wouldn't remember her in 5 minutes, and sure enough, until you tagged me in this mess,I forgot. So what you are saying is:jbhmm: I have to have absolutely

the same response to every phony, even if they have totally different circumstances?

I said the other chick was ok. Did I say fine? Did I say bad? I said ok. The most lukewarm of designations, only because her face wasn't totally tragic.

I got in here and watched a video of a mother running topless through what looks to be a studio, with a diaper booty that barely moves, and im supposed to respond with the same

level of disregard as a lady who is simply lying about being natural????:dahell: Are you 100% serious with this assertion? Why not stop digging recently, and go back through my

long ass posting history and see what I have said about some other ladies. If you are gonna make a point, make it right, cause comparing apples to oranges ain't proving shyt.

Relax breh, I'm not calling you a c00n, but it seems to me like you judge black women more harshly and give non-black women a pass. :yeshrug:
 

At30wecashout

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
36,462
Reputation
18,463
Daps
166,844
Relax breh, I'm not calling you a c00n, but it seems to me like you judge black women more harshly and give non-black women a pass. :yeshrug:
:dahell:Just call me a c00n so I can ignore you from here on out. I got a fully dressed woman I don't know shyt about...vs one running in a hall topless with a fake ass who has a history of a bad attitude:shaq2: and you don't see the difference.

I defend BW all the time, but the only time you and I exchange messages is when you perceive I slight black women:rudy:

:camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby::camby:
 
Top