Nah it was kind of both with him. He was an ugly, horny motherfukker who knew he couldn’t p*ssy with looks, charm or game, so he used his position in power to pressure women into having sex with him.Harvey Weinstein is the best example. He didn't rape and harrass those woman because he was ugly and didn't get p*ssy, he did it to make them feel the power he had over them. He was a bully.
He already had power over them. He's a producer.Harvey Weinstein is the best example. He didn't rape and harrass those woman because he was ugly and didn't get p*ssy, he did it to make them feel the power he had over them. He was a bully.
How does him already having power over them contradict what I was saying? Him having the power to do and get away with what he was doing was exactly the point of it. He was rich and influential enough to get plenty of p*ssy but he wanted to make these woman submit to his will and if they didn't, he made an example out of them by having them blackballed.He already had power over them. He's a producer.
Again, I've tried to find cases where a rapist admits its about power and I can't find any. Their are men (and women) that like the rape type scenario of 'taking it'. role play, BDSM, bondage, safe words. and people with the real 'get off on power and control' can easily let off steam. but actual rape rape? like the dude who raped the girl behind a dumpster....I'm going with mental illness.
They put Mike Tyson in prison for the EXACT same bullshyt ass story...Finds herself in a mans hotel room alone and asks herself "how did it get to this"
bytch you literally asked him about his gf multiple times, meaning you know hes taken but still popping up in his hotel. not the lobby, not the restaurant, but his room, where there is just a bed.
get yo hoe ass the fukk out of here. wtf did she think she was going to do in there? play chess? who raised these heux.
I stopped here.He was rich and influential enough to get plenty of p*ssy .
Technically what's the cutoff between coercion n being smooth with it?
He did not want to convince them, he wanted to force their hand. That is the whole point. Just like when a bully steals your lunch money, it's not really about the money, it's about the power he feels when he humiliates you by making you give him the money. Consensual BDSM is a totally different thing, because the point there is the consent. Harvey Weinstein was a bully and he got off on bullying woman into sleeping with him.I stopped here.
The power argument is kinda warped here. I don't have much power, I'm just a regular cat, but to feel powerful, I'd then do the act. If you already have power, as per you said, you're already getting what you want, because women voluntarily seek powerful men and submit. See how the argument can be mirrored?
if he wants the BDSM 'fake rape' thing folks do, he could literally do it for free just by being powerful and convincing girls.
that nikka is just mentally ill.
This definition is too vague bro, this changes at willCoercion involves emotional/physical force whereas being smooth is letting the woman feel like she’s part of the decision even if she had doubts at first.