You've been making some questionable posts this summer.
Is everything ok in life breh
That ain't questionable breh lol and point out the other questionable ones...I think 3 is a better movie..i mean the directors think so too if it helps but just to me, it works better on its own as a narrative and both marty and doc learn something and become better for it in the end. Plus I love the western take. It just seems like the Zemeckis and Gale had more energy for it than the 2nd and I believe they said on the commentary that the only reason they did 2 was to get to 3 and to me, at 29, it shows.
I try not to live in nostalgia for a lot of stuff if I can. That's the problem with being able to access shyt you loved as a kid so easily. As a kid, couldn't stand back to the future 3 and it was only because I didn't like that it took marty and doc apart but once i got to college and got the whole trilogy, 3 became the better sequel to me. It felt more in line with the original and hearing them say that they only made 2 in order to get to 3 just solidified what I felt