At first read - no problem at all with this study. it's not like this is an anti religions study, just shows how the participants reacted.
But then.....
wtf, lol and seriously? immediately came to mind. Especially when I saw the post in here ,lol. u guys are just sad. so circlejerky and so narrow-minded.
1. Liberals are more moral?? is that some type of fact? also morality is subjective... and obviously based on whatever the hell parameters the scientist have determined. NTM, look at the school, ages, and the way the subjects lean politically - this isn't an across the board test that can imply anything about the general public.
2. Selflessness doesn't equal morality. Look at the test.. they only test levels of caring about people. Even if the test did test morals--- What are the scientist personal opinionated biased views on "moral norms"??? That isn't laid out clearly. even if it was clear and fair and accurate - Morality is based on an accepted system (whether religious or secular) - and involves more than altruistic behavior. People have different levels of selflessness that doesn't necessarily correlate with their morality.
3. Why exactly are we in here bashing religion... when clearly religion is the Only thing they tested accurately and used different measures for?? Says that religion isn't affecting the acceptance of science in it's affect on 'morality'
4. your a fool if you believe that religion is pushing this negativity. Also your a see through fly by night scientific reader. Honestly brehs, the scientific community has been fukking up. Mostly good, but when ur dealing with 'facts' and knowledge - people don't let shyt slide. And ok ok ok ok okok , sure the scientific method corrects itself - but Gottdamn - when u switch shyt up so many times and every time the evidence is peer reviewed and basically irrefutable then... it's gets ridiculous. And sure religious people and conservatives may pay closer attention to the fukk ups - but the solution is to not fukk up as often or atleast avoid conclusions BEFORE test.. Then the Funding. smh I have liberal friends who talk this political campaign finance shyt.... but for some weird reason turn a blind eye to the fukkkery that happen in EVERY single area of science.
5. I haven't found this to be true, Have you guys?? NTM, the general public doesn't even understand the scientific process, shyt- i got good grades in biology and chemistry at great universities and I
Obviously don't even understand it.
6. So none of us have participated or conducted these types of experiments??? Priming... come on brehs, lets show the words- logical, examine, research, method, etc... then pretend to be surprised at the results when asking about morals, killings, animal rights, racism, eating habits, S&M, etc... I'm just dead at this shyt.
7. Let's only post 1 article like this brehs.. So no other studies prove that when a person is well off, at a liberal school, is a liberal - will reject scientific studies that are against something they strongly believe... or vice verse???
8. Is there really supposed to be some sort of defense to academic dishonesty in science !!!!!!!! smh, high learning.
9.
science has been used for most of everything we use to destroy. to Cheat on spouses, blow people up etc. thinking about science isn't a moral thought sparker in anyone's brain. It's not positive or negative.. it's a way to explore and figure out the world. Not a way to defend bad scientist, corrupt funding, or a gross amount of biased research over the last 15 years. My smartphone gives me happy thoughts, but mkultra doesn't. Is it wrong to feed animals on safaris ?.. yes at some places.. my ex she did that shyt against my advice because she is a fukk as liberal animal loving fakkit... However, She isn't immoral for that wrong offense. And I'm not even gonna get into how there is rarely any
pure altruism.
10. gtfoh... do better.
