Just found out ancient rome had black emperors

[Dr. Acula]

Didn’t you go by chicken pot pie?

Didn’t I already called you out and you agreed he was black some time ago?

Yes I did. But you never got me to agree to that. Go back and read the thread.

We can go back and forth again.

So someone posted this as being him.

Yet in another post someone posted this bust as being him.

So we're going to act like this is the same person ?

Be delusional brehs.

 

[ejthompson23]

Didn’t you go by chicken pot pie?

Didn’t I already called you out and you agreed he was black some time ago?

 

[Master Teacher]

Arab slave trade and the Atlantic slave trade combined for over 1000 years of subjugation of Africa use the internet for research instead of chasing insta-thots breh. ..

lmao you do some research

ARAB slave trade, what does that mean?

1000 years lmao

Great Britain isn't even 1000 year old put that in perspective

there were no whites at all in Africa until like 1415 when the portugeuse first started exploring over there

you're a dumb ass c00n

 

[Cabbage Patch]

No it doesn't, there's Indians in India darker than me but they damn sure ain't black.

And y'all steady bringing up white people

And can I get the link to the museum list; I'm always looking for new history.

The Indians of India are victims of 5000 years of worshipping white skin. Not even Krishna being black as Wesley Snipes could wipe that out. Krishna was an exception proving a rule.

They just got 'good hair'.

 

[ejthompson23]

I agree, like another breh said:



It's no coincidence that hundreds and hundreds and noses are broken off of monuments in Egypt.

But the Rome and Greek ones be alright?

The same way they connect the ancient civilizations of India to themselves with this "Indo-European" designation but we saw how the British viewed India when they got there...not as fellow "Indo-Europeans" but as ******s who worship cows

 

[ejthompson23]

lmao you do some research

ARAB slave trade, what does that mean?

1000 years lmao

Great Britain isn't even 1000 year old put that in perspective

there were no whites at all in Africa until like 1415 when the portugeuse first started exploring over there

you're a dumb ass c00n

I'm the c00n but you're asking me what the Arab slave trade means just get out my thread you c00n ass nikka...

 

[BlackMajik]

There were African colonies as part of the Roman Empire. The roman empire at one time included most of North Africa at its peak, including Egypt.

Septimus Severus wasn't black. We know that because the Romans had a good habit of making portriats and busts of their leaders and/or of themselves if they were part of the wealthy class, aka the Patrician class.

Lol wrong

Those BUSTS u see were made circa the 17th or 18th century. And they often made busts look like people they are most familiar with

 

[Cabbage Patch]

Breh it sounds like I’m talking to a bunch of cacs. nikkas should be at least open to accept the fact that this man was black

The agents are exposing themselves, yes. The man's painting is up.


That painting's going to end up chemically treated to lighten it, just like the Egyptian ones.

 

[Benjamin Sisko]

Yes I did. But you never got me to agree to that. Go back and read the thread.

We can go back and forth again.

So someone posted this as being him.

Yet in another post someone posted this bust as being him.

So we're going to act like this is the same person ?

Be delusional brehs.

Uh yes i did:

So we are going to ignore the portrait of him that clearly shows him as a black man next to his PAWG?

alright you win

 

[Dr. Acula]

Lol wrong

Those BUSTS u see were made circa the 17th or 18th century. And they often made busts look like people they are most familiar with

not wrong. Most of these busts were recovered from various roman excavation sites. So now we're going to say that Romans didn't have a habit of making marble busts and portraits of themselves even though even ancient ruins have stylized murals in the same vein?

 

[The Fade]

The same way they connect the ancient civilizations of India to themselves with this "Indo-European" designation but we saw how the British viewed India when they got there...not as fellow "Indo-Europeans" but as ******s who worship cows

The only thing really valid about "Indo-European" shyt is languages. Lot of Greek words and Anatolian words come from the same script, same with Etruscan and what not. Like the words Pater and Dyeus, which have many diff mirrored variations. Father and Deus/Zeus/God for example. Dyeus pater together some how becoming Jupiter

Who those nikkas exactly were is a different story which is why we need black linguists to counteract cac research to keep them in check

 

[BlackMajik]

Yea white people right

 

[Dr. Acula]

Uh yes i did:

You realize..I was playing along with what I thought was a joke by you? Given you said next to his "pawg" and used the face.

So you're telling me you weren't making a joke?

Alright just so we're clear. I was joking around. Especially given everything else I said in the thread you have to realize that I didn't really believe that.

 

[BlackMajik]

not wrong. Most of these busts were recovered from various roman excavation sites. So now we're going to say that Romans didn't have a habit of making marble busts and portraits of themselves even though even ancient ruins have stylized murals in the same vein?

More bullshyt

It's well known when these fake busts, portraits were made. But u may be one of these pale people so believe what u want

 

[(Lean Ambrose)]

@biscuitsnbangers aint these your kinfolk?...
What do you think?...