Metta World Movement
Peace and love...to all!!
This nikka LionofJudah..........
Judge: No audio testimony in Zimmerman trial
- Thread starter LionofJudah
- Start date
LionofJudah
Banned
your point is dumb in the first place u genius. Defense doesn't have to prove anything, JUST RAISE DOUBT. No evidence= no conviction. whos schooling you foolish nikkas
I'm going to explain this to you like a 3 year old, and if you don't get it, then you just don't get it. Yes, the defense is not the prosecutors, so they have to make the jury have REASONABLE DOUBT that Zimmerman didn't murder this kid that night. They do have something to 'prove' whether you believe it or not. If they didn't, they would introduce no evidence, no witnesses, nor cross examine the state's witnesses, and just let the state make its case and let it go to the jury to decide. In this particular case, Zimmerman is claiming he shot martin in self defense, so he would WANT an audio expert to confirm it was him screaming, IF IT REALLY WAS. Obviously, it wasn't, so he wants the audio testimony excluded. The tape is still going to be played, but he wants the jury to decide instead of leaving it to EXPERTS. Now, do.....you.....under....stand?
LionofJudah
Banned
He don't hear you though
Lionofjudahdumbnikka logic 6:22:13
"Obviously you're rooting for George Zimmerman because I don't understand what you're saying"
QuintessentialBM
GoldenAgeGamer82 - PSN ID
He's getting ready to walk..... I don't feel bad for the karma that will be awaiting him. It's painfully obvious that Zimmerman took the law into his own hands... He had no business killing that kid.... I seriously doubt he walks the earth very long if he walks......
Yes, the defense is not the prosecutors, so they have to make the jury believe BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT that Zimmerman didn't murder this kid that night. They do have something to 'prove' whether you believe it or not. If they didn't, they would introduce no evidence, no witnesses, nor cross examine the state's witnesses, and just let the state make its case and let it go to the jury to decide. In this particular case, Zimmerman is claiming he shot martin in self defense, so he would WANT an audio expert to confirm it was him screaming, IF IT REALLY WAS. Obviously, it wasn't, so he wants the audio testimony excluded. The tape is still going to be played, but he wants the jury to decide instead of leaving it to EXPERTS. Now, do.....you.....under....stand?
you fukking idiot.
The state brings the charges. The state maintains it was murder. The BURDEN IS ON THE STATE to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he committed murder. Anything less constitutes an aquittal.
You shouldn't speak.
LionofJudah
Banned
PrinceDeeDer
Rookie
F*ck the audio how about we talk about how EVERY juror is a white female...supposidly one hispanic female too. 
the cac mamba
Veteran
we gonna act like trayvon was a child tho
n for the record id give zimmerman trayvons fate if it was up to me
at the end of the day zimmerman was told to stand down by the dispatcher.
He didnt.
If he would have the cops would have came and spoke with tray and let him go on about his way.
Seems people forget this one detail
He didnt.
If he would have the cops would have came and spoke with tray and let him go on about his way.
Seems people forget this one detail
BlvdBrawler
Superstar
LionofJudah
Banned
The cheerleaders come out in full force boy...ready to cheer for their men on the field LOL.
Let me clear it up for those who don't know
presumed innocent until proven guilty
The job of the defense is not to prove anything. Technically, [by the law] right now Zimmerman is innocent, Until the state proves otherwise.
The job of the defense is not to prove his innocence. The job of the defense is to throw a wrench in the prosecutions claims
@LionofJudah is your typical fatherless jackass running around and don't know the difference between buttocks and the system.
presumed innocent until proven guilty
The job of the defense is not to prove anything. Technically, [by the law] right now Zimmerman is innocent, Until the state proves otherwise.
The job of the defense is not to prove his innocence. The job of the defense is to throw a wrench in the prosecutions claims
@LionofJudah is your typical fatherless jackass running around and don't know the difference between buttocks and the system.
Last edited by a moderator:
maarifajones
Rookie
There is a difference between excluding expert testimony about the audio, and excluding the audio all together. The audio itself will certainly be admitted, prosecution will probably have to rely on family friends testifying that it was Trayvon's voice instead of expert witnesses
LionofJudah
Banned
Let me clear it up for those who don't know
presumed innocent until proven guilty
The job of the defense is not to prove anything. Technically, [by the law] right now Zimmerman is innocent, Until the state proves otherwise.
The job of the defense is not to prove his innocence. The job of the defense is to throw a wrench in the prosecutions claims
@LionofJudah is your typical fatherless jackass running around and don't know the difference between buttocks and the system.
2 Timothy 3:7
Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
Last edited by a moderator: