What you're saying isn't true.Not as much as Rogan when mainstream media has done way worse.
This is absolutely false, during Eisenhower's time there was not such a big divide between left and right at all.
They were actually somewhat similar.
CNN lied about the war.
MSNBC never talks about the war and fired Phil Donahue for voicing his opinions and then Dylan Ratigan for his rant on corporate corruption.
Can you even imagine if Joe Rogan had an associate on the show and he corrected Rogan and then Rogan fired him, do you know even know the size of the online backlash there would be?
Fox News had Bill O'Reilly making people more racist and stupid, and now hannity and tucker got the batons and running with it.
CNBC is always pro-bank.
Im not saying the govt. didn't lie about the war, i'm saying mainstream media was absolutely 100% complicit.
MSNBC did expose all of Bush's lies in the end but then was pro war during Obama.
Put it this way, mainstream media has blood on it's hands, Rogan does not.
I understand people's discontent with him, but the energy against mainstream media should be ten fold.
There has been intense media criticism for decades and in no way is Rogan attacked more than figures like Tucker Carlson.
And there were massive divides between Left and Right - they were murdering Leftist unionists across the U.S.
And no one is saying the mainstream media wasn't complicit, but you're talking about the state-backed national and international media, which have always followed the state-line, even going back to the 1800s