"Joker: Folie a Deux" | sequel to "Joker" starring Joaquin Phoenix and Lady Gaga

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
39,269
Reputation
8,386
Daps
98,769
After the first film there was a lot of theories that said Arthur was not the true Joker but would instead be the inspiration behind the character we would come to know. This film seems to be saying those theories are correct or Arthur is straight up fugazi, either way it's stupid :snoop:


And what about all of us who flat out told yall

"This aint no damn joker:childplease:"

No fancy theories,just telling the world this effeminate bum cant possibly be the Joker:mjlol:


Cant imagine finding out I spent 5 hours watching a movie about some random guy who I was told was another guy:picard:


And sadly I already wasted 2:30 watching the first(it felt longer)
If this aint the troll/heist of the century,what is?

wVDOf3.gif
 

nieman

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
17,443
Reputation
2,395
Daps
34,337
Reppin
Philly
DC just cant get right

How did they allow this to happen
Seems like everyone said fukk no, but then Warner added too many zeros to the check.

At least Joaquin didn't phone it in. He tried...Gaga tried. But it seems like there was a 5 page script...size 20 font, triple spaced and they made a 2hr 30min movie out of it.
 

Cladyclad

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
43,919
Reputation
4,574
Daps
112,445
Reppin
Detroit Lions, Michigan Wolverines & LWO
Seems like everyone said fukk no, but then Warner added too many zeros to the check.

At least Joaquin didn't phone it in. He tried...Gaga tried. But it seems like there was a 5 page script...size 20 font, triple spaced and they made a 2hr 30min movie out of it.
This shyt 2 1/2 hours

:dahell:

I loved the first movie. This sucks. I probably will never watch this ever.
 
Top