He asked questions the way Elon did..no follow up, just bullshyt. That was 2 pals talking.
He asked questions the way Elon did..no follow up, just bullshyt. That was 2 pals talking.
Kamala absolutely could gain new voters by going on Rogan. She stands to gain more than Trump would by doing so
I know this site loves to dismiss the Rogan show as a right wing haven but it's an oversimplification. People from every political demographic watch Rogan
You really think Kamala has nothing to gain by going on the largest media platform in the world?
It's not about handling a podcaster. It's about whether or not it's worth actually engaging with these people. Will she be able to convert people from Rogan's audience and the answer to that is no.If Trump or Kamala want this they have to go through the lions dens. Bottom line. They both did their fair share of ducking which is why NEITHER is capable.
If She can't handle a "podcaster" then how you expect her to handle foreign affairs or handling threats from other Nations?
How she gonna talk to Kim jung Un Putin or Jinping if she cant handle pressure from Rogan?
I def agree with you on this.Let's go down the list
Still peddling his I didn't lose nonsense. Rogan gives him a chance to provide any evidence and he veers off to hunters laptop
Talking about judges didn't have what it took to help him overturn the last election?
Women who don't like him are stupid?
Glorifying dictators as smart people? Even when Rogan gave him a chance to sound reasonable and agree that you could also say they are dangerous. He ignored it and instead Trump doubled down and said there's evil people in America
You think those points are normal? That shyt is not winning over anyone except for disgruntled incels
At the least it wasn't a complete Trainwreck, but there was very little that helped make the case he should be the next president
his audience is a wide spectrum. again, he is not the biggest for no reason.It's not about handling a podcaster. It's about whether or not it's worth actually engaging with these people. Will she be able to convert people from Rogan's audience and the answer to that is no.
No they're not. I told you already, we can agree to disagree. You don't need to engage with me.his audience is a wide spectrum. again, he is not the biggest for no reason.
Talk to my server thenNo they're not. I told you already, we can agree to disagree. You don't need to engage with me.
If Trump or Kamala want this they have to go through the lions dens. Bottom line. They both did their fair share of ducking which is why NEITHER is capable.
If She can't handle a "podcaster" then how you expect her to handle foreign affairs or handling threats from other Nations?
How she gonna talk to Kim jung Un Putin or Jinping if she cant handle pressure from Rogan?
He skipped the media and went directly to the internet. heavy hitting podcasts with more views than fox and cnn combined. he could go on cnn but he isnt getting 25 million views in 24 hours going on there, nor reaching nearly the amount of diverse people. people dont watch cable like that anymore at least not those under 55.Trump has skipped every media interview except for Fox. 1 podcast should not make or break a candidate. I'm sorry.
Kamala went through the Fox News lions den. What did Trump go through? Ballwashing from Elon, Fox news and Rogan.
I don't think it's about pressure. She was a bloody prosecutor.
This argument shows a complete misunderstanding of leadership versus entertainment. Handling a provocateur like Rogan has nothing to do with facing leaders like Putin or Xi. Diplomacy demands strategy, control, and real-world expertise, not the theatrics of entertaining a podcaster's audience. Reducing leadership to media stunts trivializes the real skills and decisions required to protect national interests. And Trump has never walked through the lion's den. He's been going on alt-right friendly podcasts when he's not on RSBN, Fox, or some other right-wing show.If Trump or Kamala want this they have to go through the lions dens. Bottom line. They both did their fair share of ducking which is why NEITHER is capable.
If She can't handle a "podcaster" then how you expect her to handle foreign affairs or handling threats from other Nations?
How she gonna talk to Kim jung Un Putin or Jinping if she cant handle pressure from Rogan?
It's not about handling a podcaster. It's about whether or not it's worth actually engaging with these people. Will she be able to convert people from Rogan's audience and the answer to that is no.
you should probably watch the 3 hours. i know, i know, in this day and age attention span etc etc, but you can pause, do other things and go back. that's what I did.I don't follow. It wouldn't be a "conversation".
bingo. I learned a lot. both negative and positive. I didn't know who trump actually is. I know rally talking points trump, but who he actually is? no. but I saw a glimpse of his actual persona. I dont think I heard him say "nobody does blah blah better than me" once. he was normal.Rogan has the largest platform in the country whenever yall like it or not. His style is more conversational and less argumentative so Kamala would fit right in.
That Fox News bullshyt on the other hand is nothing but shouting matches and lying. Rogan basically let people talk... He probably would have made people see another side of her.
Kamala absolutely could gain new voters by going on Rogan. She stands to gain more than Trump would by doing so
I know this site loves to dismiss the Rogan show as a right wing haven but it's an oversimplification. People from every political demographic watch Rogan
You really think Kamala has nothing to gain by going on the largest media platform in the world?