All those links I posted on the story and you are still talking out bullet points out your ass. Reade doesn’t have more evidence of sexual assault. You say that and provide no links to any evidence but a Larry long call where once again her mother is vague and could have been responding to Reades claim at the time she was pissed at the staff because at the time Reade was claiming Biden’s staff was picking on her.
Show me social media posts where Ford praises Kavanaugh for his stance on women victims after the assault?
Show me evidence of Ford being turned down by lawyers because she came there expecting them to do PR?
Show me where the NYTimes, AP, and Washington Post came out and said after interviewing Ford and looking at the evidence we don’t think there is enough to report on this story?
Show me social media posts where Ford became a fervent supporter of political enemies of Kavanaugh and Russians and then made the claim.
Ford was telling people what Kavanaugh did to her in 2012 before he was running for anything. Reade came out with her third version of the story (that escalated it to rape) in March after Biden got the nomination.
If you can’t see that Reade’s story is problematic because of the shifting narrative, timeline, and questionable motivation you’re a fukking idiot.
You got some fukking nerve saying this after you started this conversation by saying Christine Blasey Ford had multiple eyewitnesses and dozens of people who corroborated immediately, which you were wrong about and had to backtrack about.
Not one of the 4 other people that CFB claimed were in the house at the time have any recollection of the assault, including her friend Leland Keyser who says she wasn't there and doesn't believe her.
“It would be impossible for me to be the only girl at a get-together with three guys, have her leave and then not figure out how she’s going to get home,” Keyser said. She added that she didn't remember parties like the one Ford described, or spending much time with Georgetown Prep students like Kavanaugh, whom Keyser said she didn't recall.
“Those facts together I don’t recollect, and it just doesn’t make any sense,” Keyser said -- but she noted that she had spoken to many people who “wanted me to remember something different."
That's her friend who said that. The only evidence are therapist notes and they don't even match up to her story. The therapist notes says she was assaulted by 4 boys and it was in the mid 80's. She also told the WaPo it was in the mid-80's. Kavanaugh was at Yale at the time. She testified to Congress in 2018 that it happened in 1982.
Tara Reade has her brother, a neighbor, and a co-worker...and her mom who called Larry King about whatever happened corroborating her. So yes, Reade does have more corroborating evidence than CBF. She has 4 people who corroborate her on record and 2 more that are unnamed.
The fact that you cited the NYT, AP, and WaPo not reporting on it as evidence to support your position is very telling. I can tell you haven't even looked at the evidence on the CBF story. You just deem it more credible than Reade's because those outlets "reported" on it, as if they have any fukking credibility when it comes to an issue like this
You really think the NYT and WaPo wouldn't have had Tara Reade on the front page if it was a Republican she was accusing, or Bernie Sanders?
You don't even see it. That is the story...the bias of the NYT, WaPo as well as CNN, MSNBC, and the whole mainstream media completely embarrassing themselves by trying to bury this story because the accused is the Democratic presidential nominee.
from people who showed greater care for stories with lower standards.
