I'm not shocked this turned into a semi jay-z hate thread
But the coli is a prob black site huh
But the coli is a prob black site huh
I'm not surprised. Everytime we talk about supporting Tidal, BBB, or some other black-owned business this it what it dissolves into.I'm not shocked this turned into a semi jay-z hate thread
But the coli is a prob black site huh
You can keep lying until you're blue in the face. The facts speak for themselves. Black people don't own shyt in Atlanta so if it was an example of blacks supporting blacks like you're falsely claiming, then that wouldn't be the case. I don't know why you clowns like coming here talking out your ass.
You've got it to be a real stupid motherfukker to think that I was talking in absolutes. Of course there are black owned businesses in Atlanta you dumb son of a bytch. The point is that black ownership in Atlanta doesn't come anywhere close to representing the black percentage of Atlanta's population. Blacks make up over 60% of the population but don't own anywhere near 60% of Atlanta's businesses, proving that they aren't practicing the group economics that you claim they are.
You nikkas are obsessed with Lavar Ball like dude is Marcus Garvey. Pathetic.
It's called "designer", broke boy.
You've got it to be a real stupid
For the same reason that you're a lying ass bytch. If it's not that serious then why are you trying to disguise your hate? The lack of support that blacks have for each other is something well known regardless of what Jay says or doesn't say. You denying that simply because you want to shyt on Jay z is a testament to being a hating ass bytch and I don't respect thatWhy you so mad? It's not that serious nikka.
For the same reason that you're a lying ass bytch. If it's not thab
You're the one acting like you like you walked in on Jay z palming the back of your mom's head or some shyt. You're talking dumb shut and you deserve to be insulted. Atlanta is not proof that blacks don't have problems supporting each other. You haven't made any valid arguments backing that because there are no arguments to back that up.well it's clear you're bringing offline personal shyt to the discussion - you're dodging my points and throwing more insults than arguments that support your stance
i'm leaving you to it though, and don't worry...she'll come back fam. or not, i don't care.
We'd need to find out more numbers. I'd be interested in knowing, of that 60%, what percentage has the income to sustain a business as it relates to the actual percentage of black business ownership. Like if all the white businesses are owned by the top 20% of whites in the city with an income of $xxxxxx, what is the relative income and percentage of black ownership likewise. I think that would be the numbers to base a real argument off of.You've got it to be a real stupid motherfukker to think that I was talking in absolutes. Of course there are black owned businesses in Atlanta you dumb son of a bytch. The point is that black ownership in Atlanta doesn't come anywhere close to representing the black percentage of Atlanta's population. Blacks make up over 60% of the population but don't own anywhere near 60% of Atlanta's businesses, proving that they aren't practicing the group economics that you claim they are.
Why do you cats like bending over backwards to deflect from the obvious. Do you really need a comprehensive stat based breakdown of Atlanta economics to come to the obvious realization that blacks in Atlanta aren't practicing group economics on any kind of grand scale?We'd need to find out more numbers. I'd be interested in knowing, of that 60%, what percentage has the income to sustain a business as it relates to the actual percentage of black business ownership. Like if all the white businesses are owned by the top 20% of whites in the city with an income of $xxxxxx, what is the relative income and percentage of black ownership likewise. I think that would be the numbers to base a real argument off of.
Jay z sounds dumb as hell on this point. Black people don't sit back and purposely NOT support brands because they're ran by us
Look around in the room you're in, everything you see has a CEO behind it, and without using google you couldn't name 5 of em
That's how it's supppse to be..company CEO's shouldn't be out front trying to be the stars - you see that ever now and then (papa john's) and it's usually AFTER they've become CEOS and the brand is successful
I don't need shyt. This is yall argument and y'all are debating numbers. Im simply saying use a different equation to base it off of, I don't care about whatever conclusion yall come to. I don't waste energy trying to change people's minds about anything.Why do you cats like bending over backwards to deflect from the obvious. Do you really need a comprehensive stat based breakdown of Atlanta economics to come to the obvious realization that blacks in Atlanta aren't practicing group economics on any kind of grand scale?