More like actual leaders spend time leading and building and not analyzing comic book trailers.
I remember before, earlier in the year I said to be careful of who anybody considers a leader.
Some of these same "leaders" were advocating a full on frontal assault similar to what David Banner was telling Lyfe Jennings at the town hall meetings and going right at them guns blazing.
A General would never advocate sending in his troops into a battle that'll end in bloodshed for their side unless they see not other feasible option (at which point the war has been decided and they're going to out out on their shield). But here, the battle is far from over. Unless people actually took their advice as a greenlight and go through with it. Resulting in:
The other side calling in the national guard, designating the area a war zone and fair game, which may set back the communities decades. A General/leader would have enough foresight not to make such rash decisions to advocate mass scale violence because that plays right into the opposition's hands.
I get it people want change, but if people were to follow some of the advice given by them straight up because of emotional outrage (while you notice they're in their safe space), they'd be considered one of the worst leaders in history.
