Japanese firm proposes building solar panel ring around moon to power Earth

FrostBite

All Star
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
1,400
Reputation
130
Daps
3,471
Reppin
NULL
Well then.

http://gizmodo.com/japan-wants-to-ring-the-moon-with-solar-panels-to-power-1474946201

"The Shimizu Corporation wants to, essentially, build a ring of solar panels around the moon's equator and transmitted back to the Earth via microwave. And they want to get the project, dubbed LUNA RING (yes, all caps), started by 2035."

"Shimizu wants to employ a small army of robotic construction workers to install a 400 meter-wide ring of solar voltaic panels along the 11,000 km lunar equator. Not only will the ring's concrete base be constructed from local resources, Shimizu envisions that at least a portion of the panels themselves will be built using local materials as well."
 

FrostBite

All Star
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
1,400
Reputation
130
Daps
3,471
Reppin
NULL
Basing the earth's infrastructure around anything built in space is a terrible mistake.

Debris, flares, freak accidents of any kind...

Agreed. I understand Japan's concern for finding an alternate energy source after that nuclear reactor meltdown, but this just sounds too risky. Not to mention the cost of such a project would be insanely astronomical.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
89,195
Reputation
3,727
Daps
158,778
Reppin
Brooklyn
Why not? I say do it. We can't burn coal forever. Have Hydro and Nuclear for backup.
 
Last edited:

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,486
Daps
26,224
They always are coming up with innovative shyt.

how would this affect our tides, tilt n shyt.... ?


Also, we have a ton of space on Earth... Why not do it here and be more cost affective.. and also minimize the risk?
 

tmonster

Superstar
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
17,900
Reputation
3,205
Daps
31,789
They always are coming up with innovative shyt.

how would this affect our tides, tilt n shyt.... ?


Also, we have a ton of space on Earth... Why not do it here and be more cost affective.. and also minimize the risk?
Infographic3.jpg


and

AreaRequiredWindOnly.jpg


and


infographic-what-if-solar-were-on-every-roof1.jpg






which begs the question to the governments of the world
bazqF.gif
 

OneManGang

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,376
Reputation
4,246
Daps
71,990
Agreed. I understand Japan's concern for finding an alternate energy source after that nuclear reactor meltdown, but this just sounds too risky. Not to mention the cost of such a project would be insanely astronomical.
Would it though? Using todays technology, the most expensive process would be fuel to get everything there. Imagine that by the time this project takes off, we have fully functioning space elevators to get everything out of the atmosphere more efficiently (takes much less fuel to actually get to moon...escaping Earth takes a lot of energy). Cost gets massively cut by this. Not too much in the realm of science fiction either. Price could be moot to the CEOs as well because a project like this if completed can pay for itself quickly!

They always are coming up with innovative shyt.

how would this affect our tides, tilt n shyt.... ?


Also, we have a ton of space on Earth... Why not do it here and be more cost affective.. and also minimize the risk?
This wouldnt effect tides and tilt at all. They are just putting solar panels on the moon. Insignificant on a planetary scale. But, to you point about why not just do it on Earth? I'd imagine the coordination needed to assemble governments to allow building and infrastructure would be too much. Then environmental issues, developing on protected areas, the miles and miles of cables needed to route the energy. In a more practical sense, the moon has no atmosphere as well, meaning way more radiation will reach the panels resulting in more energy. On the moon, its free real estate basically, and you can just transmit the energy back like we do with radio waves. Just my ramblings though. Earth certainly does have the space to do it.
They better make sure it doesnt fukk up the tides. Japan itself would get that massive tsunami. Im sure it wouldnt but who knows.

Anyway, shyt seems outlandish as fukk. Its gonna start in 22 years? By robotic construction workers? :deadmanny:
Ya this would not effect tidal motions. The moon is 1/3 the size of Earth. For it to have an affect on tides, the mass of the moon would have to increase significantly. No human construction project would be close to doing this. And robots do construction on a small scale now. I wouldnt laugh at the possibility of them using robots at all.

Infographic3.jpg


and

AreaRequiredWindOnly.jpg


and


infographic-what-if-solar-were-on-every-roof1.jpg






which begs the question to the governments of the world
bazqF.gif
Politics and interests. Traditional energies are too ingrained into the fabric of the modern world to let things like this go down without a fight. Solar technology is quickly becoming more affordable. Its really fascinating stuff when you look at how these panels work. The materials to capture the photons is what held back marketability of these for so long. I think government is subsidizing the costs for many places now. When newer more efficient tech to capture photons appears, solar will be the definitive way to go.
 

FrostBite

All Star
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
1,400
Reputation
130
Daps
3,471
Reppin
NULL
Would it though? Using todays technology, the most expensive process would be fuel to get everything there. Imagine that by the time this project takes off, we have fully functioning space elevators to get everything out of the atmosphere more efficiently (takes much less fuel to actually get to moon...escaping Earth takes a lot of energy). Cost gets massively cut by this. Not too much in the realm of science fiction either. Price could be moot to the CEOs as well because a project like this if completed can pay for itself quickly!

A space elevator (however that would work) isn't something that's happening in this lifetime. As far as the material, we're talking about a ring that is 400 meters wide and spans 7,000 miles. So yes, that cost will be obscene.
 
Top