One of these teams has James, the GOAT player, playing for them. The other team has LeBron. Do the math.![]()


One of these teams has James, the GOAT player, playing for them. The other team has LeBron. Do the math.![]()
I’m genuinely interested. No shade to the clippers at all. But are clippers fans mainly LA transplants?
What? The cubs have defined territory (north side), wrigleyville etc. vs the White SoxSame shyt as being a cubs fan instead of a white sox fan.
This is disingenuous. In cities large enough to have 2 teams there's always a big brother/little brother haves and have-nots dynamic.But how can it be a bandwagon in ya own city tho?That’s literally your team. And they played in the same arena too.
The Devils have nothing to do with New York.NYC has 3 with Rangers, LI( which played in Brooklyn for a spell) , and the Jersey team.
well the Mets thing is simple:I wonder the same thing, and I'm a fan of the baseball equivalent of the Clippers (The Mets)![]()
point being theres more than one team in a large popular city (LA, NY, CHI).What? The cubs have defined territory (north side), wrigleyville etc. vs the White Sox
And I’m pretty sure there’s more Cubs fan than Sox fans
No they wouldn't.. San Diego is a top 3-10 city but arguably the worst sports city in america..The Clippers used to be the Buffalo Braves they would occasionally play in Toronto due to not being particularly popular in the city and not having a proper stadium. They were moved to San Diego in an exchange between owners, finally sold to one of the most racist owners in Donald Sterling. It's funny that Sterling wanted to move the team to LA in the early 80s but the NBA refused it. It was David Stern a jew helping another jew to accomplish this or else Sterling would have given up and sold the team. He was actually suing the league at that time.
The Clippers being in San Diego would have been 10 times more popular than they are today and probably worth a lot more too.
I always felt like because they were on the opposite ends, as in Clippers constantly being among the worst and Lakers constantly being among the best.
People could basically support both teams, just support "LA".
But since they've more or less been true competitors since the lob city era, and that NBA is very much a superstar driven league. They probably attracted a lot of teenagers who are now grownups while retaining casuals that support both teams
They wouldn't be popular as opposed to what? Them remaining in LA? Competing with the same fan base and a team that's an historic franchise arguably the most valuable nba team. Too bad Balmer built a 2 billion dollar arena in Inglewood. The clippers deserve their own city. San Diego, Seattle or Vancouver would have been perfect for them.No they wouldn't.. San Diego is a top 3-10 city but arguably the worst sports city in america..
SD is a raider city
Not the same because White Sox is the South Side team while the Cubs are on the North Side (if you from Chicago, there’s a difference). The Clippers and Lakers were playing in the same stadium for years. Anyone under the age of 50 likely wasn’t a fan when they were the San Diego Clippers. I think they were in Anaheim after that before they moved to Staples tho.Same shyt as being a cubs fan instead of a white sox fan.