HookersandIceCream
#TeamOrange
@HookersandIceCream you bytch ass mafukka 1 starrin this![]()
Cause Civilization 5 is not out for consoles and I refuse to play on a inferior PC platform
![pacspit :pacspit: :pacspit:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/pacspit.gif)
@HookersandIceCream you bytch ass mafukka 1 starrin this![]()
Cause Civilization 5 is not out for consoles and I refuse to play on a inferior PC platform![]()
Resort to childish responses because you have no counter argument brehs
cant use the budget excuse no more though since intel came out with some $200 and $250 processorsMy AMD build runs everything fine so no u dont need Intel especially if you're on a budget. AMD is exactly for budget gamers.
cant use the budget excuse no more though since intel came out with some $200 and $250 processors
i multi thread besides gaming so AMD still my #1 choice
- In multi-threaded programs, the FX-8350 processor has 2% higher performance.
- The Intel Core i5-4670K CPU is 53% faster in single-threaded applications.
Screw the 760's pay that extra 100$ and get the 770 which is top 5 performance wise for an amazing price.
Im refering to more then just gaming brehFX-8350 vs i5-4670k
for the people wondering what this means
single threading is 90% of the games ever created
I would think 53% performance trumps 2% performance
![]()