Cat piss martini
Veteran
Court should be a damn mod.
You keep talking about shyt that has NOTHING to do with anything. You sound like a groupie that goes "My man made this much money, who cares if he treats me bad"I get that it has its advantages, but at the end of the day people want the best gaming system. The power matters to. If you ask most if they would have sacrificed the entertainment shyt for a stronger gaming machine, the answer would be a resounding yes overall. The cheaper xbox one now is still being mollywhopped by the PS4 in sales. Even last year with all the price drops it was being outsold. Xbox only has clout in the states, it was never gonna outsell the PS4 regardless. While the gap may not have been as big as it is now (and growing), I do think the sales would have been closer with the PS4 being up by a few mill. Xbox is not a global brand, Playstation is and will always be.
So I'm a loser while you was writing love letters to me at midnight on a friday nightInstead of destroying us, how about you destroy that used mattress and buy a new one. fukking loser
You know what is amazing to me. That people can say things on the internet, then others just repeat it like its fact. To say a console war is over at launch makes zero sense. None of these systems have hit their "stride" yet. You'd think this was the first time sony gamers experienced a new gen saying things like that.It's been over since launch
Yeah, but that is why I made this thread to destroy all the bullshyt nerds on the internet come up with. You included.Yall should just chill on this whole "console war" nonsense. There really isn't a console war for these simple reasons.
1. The conditions for victory in such a competition are completely subjective. Best system for example or better games all subjective.
2. These companies can all have successful products without selling the most. Meaning who sells the most is pointless.
3. As a consumer you can own all the products if you so choose and If you do how is there a war between them?
4. Fanboys will never concede a point anyway they'll just continue to shout talking points and deny opposing ones as well as constructing faulty logical arguments that only are made to push said talking points.
5. There is no advantages for you as a consumer to be loyal to any of these brands anyway. Taking quality options away from yourself for the sake of brand loyalty to a company that won't give you anything in return is crazy.
An example of #4 is last generation the Wii sold the most. Selling the most in this generation is supposedly winning but in the last generation the Wii was dismissed by most fanboys and it's victory didn't count. Often you'd see them limit the argument to "HD" consoles. This generation people talk graphics specs but as I've always said if you care about game performance you're buying multi-platform games on a PC. Mention that and console only gamers get salty and try to act like that's not true. This doesn't even count the whole shipped vs sold argument or console makers bundling their sales of all platforms together when the numbers aren't favorable and electing not to do that when they are favorable. One in particular in a certain generation elected to lump all their sales together then in a subsequent generation intentionally elected not to do it anymore and the reverse is also true for their direct competitor.
All this stuff boils down to is a bunch of goalpost moving. It's all pointless. It's like arguing with Rush Limbaugh to get him to say Obama is an ok president. He'll never say it even if it is true.
Bad bags of dope fall off?Corndog fell off like a bad bag of dope
Corndog fell off like a bad bag of dope
Yall should just chill on this whole "console war" nonsense. There really isn't a console war for these simple reasons.
1. The conditions for victory in such a competition are completely subjective. Best system for example or better games all subjective.
2. These companies can all have successful products without selling the most. Meaning who sells the most is pointless.
3. As a consumer you can own all the products if you so choose and If you do how is there a war between them?
4. Fanboys will never concede a point anyway they'll just continue to shout talking points and deny opposing ones as well as constructing faulty logical arguments that only are made to push said talking points.
5. There is no advantages for you as a consumer to be loyal to any of these brands anyway. Taking quality options away from yourself for the sake of brand loyalty to a company that won't give you anything in return is crazy.
An example of #4 is last generation the Wii sold the most. Selling the most in this generation is supposedly winning but in the last generation the Wii was dismissed by most fanboys and it's victory didn't count. Often you'd see them limit the argument to "HD" consoles. This generation people talk graphics specs but as I've always said if you care about game performance you're buying multi-platform games on a PC. Mention that and console only gamers get salty and try to act like that's not true. This doesn't even count the whole shipped vs sold argument or console makers bundling their sales of all platforms together when the numbers aren't favorable and electing not to do that when they are favorable. One in particular in a certain generation elected to lump all their sales together then in a subsequent generation intentionally elected not to do it anymore and the reverse is also true for their direct competitor.
All this stuff boils down to is a bunch of goalpost moving. It's all pointless. It's like arguing with Rush Limbaugh to get him to say Obama is an ok president. He'll never say it even if it is true.