It's crazy seeing "Da Bearsss" score just 3 pts in a game when Caleb Williams........

[Harry B]

Hes at league avetage or little worse for sacks caused by him. This shows the Oline is in fact fukking terrible because theyve also allowed like 250 pressures.

You nikkas dont watch the bears and why eould you, they suck. But we do and IDC what type of cherry picked stats you want to use that line is garbage and even worse is injured often.

Caleb has his faults and has a lot to work on going forward but this retarded discourse thats going on acting like that line is not horrendous is triggering

Can’t you see that the next like 7 guys all have 40-50%

 

[Harry B]

He's responsible for 45 percent of his sacks he's not even in the top five when it comes to sacks responsible for @Po pimp literally broke it down a few post ago and you still post this

I don’t know what you are talking about.

How hard is it to read a bar chart, his 45%>>> anyone else’s x%

 

[Po pimp]

So he still leads by far when adjusted for it


And should’ve added another 7 in the week 17

When looking at totals, leads by far in the sacks he’s not responsible for as well though.

 

[Deafheaven]

Can’t you see that the next like 7 guys all have 40-50%

What are you not getting that even if caleb accounts for 45% of his sacks thats still 35-40 directly attributed to the line faults, and yall tryna to tell me the line is okay ffukk out of here I have eyes

 

[Harry B]

What are you not getting that even if caleb accounts for 45% of his sacks thats still 35-40 directly attributed to the line faults, and yall tryna to tell me the line is okay ffukk out of here I have eyes

What I do get is that he leads sacks in any way you adjust the numbers.

Graph from the same person



Personally I don't give too much weight to these analytics, adjustments and shyt made by random fantasy people

 

[Deafheaven]

What I do get is that he leads sacks in any way you adjust the numbers.

Graph from the same person



Personally I don't give too much weight to these analytics, adjustments and shyt made by random fantasy people

me either my eyes are good enough most of the time.

according to this chart MVP Josh Allen is a terrible thrower of the ball

 

[CHICAGO]

Hes at league avetage or little worse for sacks caused by him. This shows the Oline is in fact fukking terrible because theyve also allowed like 250 pressures.

You nikkas dont watch the bears and why eould you, they suck. But we do and IDC what type of cherry picked stats you want to use that line is garbage and even worse is injured often.

Caleb has his faults and has a lot to work on going forward but this retarded discourse thats going on acting like that line is not horrendous is triggering

YOURE MISSING THE POINT....

JUST BECAUSE THE OLINE IS TRASH
DOESNT MEAN HE HAS TO BE RESPONSIBLE
FOR 31 SACKS ALL BY HIS SELF.

IT JUST SAYS EVERYBODY IS TRASH.

SAYING "WELL ITS ONLY 46%"
DOESNT WORK IN THIS SCENARIO
BECAUSE HIS 46% IS 31 SACKS
WHILE STAFFORDS 71% IS 20 SACKS.

THESE ARE LOSING PLAYS
NOT A GAME OF MEDIANS, MATH
AND AVERAGES.




​

 

[Deafheaven]

YOURE MISSING THE POINT....

JUST BECAUSE THE OLINE IS TRASH
DOESNT MEAN HE HAS TO BE RESPONSIBLE
FOR 31 SACKS ALL BY HIS SELF.

IT JUST SAYS EVERYBODY IS TRASH.

SAYING "WELL ITS ONLY 46%"
DOESNT WORK IN THIS SCENARIO
BECAUSE HIS 46% IS 31 SACKS
WHILE STAFFORDS 71% IS 20 SACKS.

THESE ARE LOSING PLAYS
NOT A GAME OF MEDIANS, MATH
AND AVERAGES.




​

I'm not missing the point.

If the line was better, him causing 46% of his sacks would be less sacks overall. as you said Staffords is way higher and thats only 20 because his line is obviously better.

 

[CHICAGO]

I'm not missing the point.

If the line was better, him causing 46% of his sacks would be less sacks overall. as you said Staffords is way higher and thats only 20 because his line is obviously better.

IF THE OLINE WAS BETTER
HIS PERCENTAGE OF SACKS CAUSED
WOULD BE EVEN HIGHER.

THE OLINE BEING BETTER DOESNT
MAKE HIS 31 SACKS GO AWAY
OR MAKE HIM BETTER AT AVOIDING SACKS.
HE WOULD STILL CAUSE
THOSE 31 SACKS ON HIS OWN
WITH A GOOD OLINE.

IT SIMPLY MAKES THE 36 SACKS THE OLINE
CAUSED DECREASE.




​

 

[Deafheaven]

IF THE OLINE WAS BETTER
HIS PERCENTAGE OF SACKS CAUSED
WOULD BE EVEN HIGHER.

THE OLINE BEING BETTER DOESNT
MAKE HIS 31 SACKS GO AWAY
OR MAKE HIM BETTER AT AVOIDING SACKS.
HE WOULD STILL CAUSE
THOSE 31 SACKS ON HIS OWN
WITH A GOOD OLINE.

IT SIMPLY MAKES THE 36 SACKS THE OLINE
CAUSED DECREASE.




​

Respectfully...this makes zero fukking sense. So if the oline was good and say, 31 sacks are allowed and Caleb maintains the same 46% that means roughly 15-17 would be on him. Unless you truly believe he would cause 31 sacks by himself no matter how good the oline is then

You free to think whatever you want, I'm not about to argue over it any more I said my piece.

 

[CHICAGO]

Respectfully...this makes zero fukking sense. So if the oline was good and say, 31 sacks are allowed and Caleb maintains the same 46% that means roughly 15-17 would be on him. Unless you truly believe he would cause 31 sacks by himself no matter how good the oline is then

You free to think whatever you want, I'm not about to argue over it any more I said my piece.

HES ALREADY CAUSED 31 SACKS
BY HIMSELF THE SAME WAY STAFFORD
HAS CAUSED 20 WITH A GOOD OLINE.



​

 

[RubioTheCruel]

I literally said at times he plays hero ball which leads to sacks but the oline is awful anyone saying otherwise is lying and trolling

It’s a bit of both. OL isn’t a strength for the Bears but Caleb holds onto the ball WAY too long, trying to make something out of nothing. The OL can’t pass block forever.