data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74581/7458179c37bd5f078c5fe18d8376e34778a36b16" alt="comeon :comeon: :comeon:"
since you're too intellectual and metaphysical to do some basic fukking googles, i did it for you:
Simp
•A man that puts himself in a
subservient/submissive position under women in hopes of winning them over, without the female bringing anything to the table.
•A man that puts too much value on a female for no reason .
•A man that prides himself with "
Chivalry" in hopes of getting sexual gratification form women .
comparing something as trivial to fukking a chick to conducting business, brehs.
compare kicking a woman (who knew full well what the agenda is before she arrived) out your crib, to kicking a potential money maker out of a public setting, brehs.
you're purposely being facetious and making the assumption that all women are deserving of some kind of royal treatment. this is fem logic.
the fukk do i need to look good to a female for? how exactly is that furthering my goals or purpose in life, unless my only goal is to have sex with women?
you can't be handling much business if you really out here comparing getting money and conducting constructive activity to having sex.
you nikkas can't be serious with these fukking mister fantastic reaches. unless you're trolling.