Israeli troops fire at 3 UNIFIL positions in southern Lebanon, U.N. source says

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,821
Reppin
the ether
Remember, in order to justify shooting on UN peacekeepers, @Sccit began with the following lie:

IRAN HEADS THE UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL



When caught, he shifted to a different lie:

YOU LOVE ARGUING SEMANTICS TO DETRACT FROM THE PRIMARY POINT .. SOULLESS BEHAVIOR

Iran's appointment to chair the 2023 UN Human Rights Council



But this is the actual text of the link he's posting, where you can see he deceptively deleted the last two words off the title:

Iran's appointment to chair the 2023 UN Human Rights Council Social Forum

The appointment of Ali Bahreini, Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran and Permanent Representative to the United Nations, to chair the 2023 United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) Social Forum (2 and 3 November 2023), is nothing more than a slap in the face given the human rights situation of most Iranians




Iran does not head the UN Human Rights Council, and it never has. Iran is not a member of the UN Human Rights Council, and it never has been. The ambassador of Iran chaired ONE two-day social forum last year where he had no decision-making power over any UN Human Rights activities. It was a bad look, but it had NOTHING to to with heading the UN Human Rights Council and NOTHING to excuse Israel firing on UN peacekeepers.



I wonder if this is the point where @Sccit triples down with a third lie, or if he's going to disappear. Because I've never seen him repent from these blatant lies when murder is on the agenda.
 

ReasonableMatic

................................
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
16,114
Reputation
6,252
Daps
100,083
Remember, in order to justify shooting on UN peacekeepers, @Sccit began with the following lie:
IRAN HEADS THE UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL

:dead:
When caught, he shifted to a different lie:
YOU LOVE ARGUING SEMANTICS TO DETRACT FROM THE PRIMARY POINT .. SOULLESS BEHAVIOR

Iran's appointment to chair the 2023 UN Human Rights Council
But this is the actual text of the link he's posting, where you can see he deceptively deleted the last two words off the title:

Iran's appointment to chair the 2023 UN Human Rights Council Social Forum

The appointment of Ali Bahreini, Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran and Permanent Representative to the United Nations, to chair the 2023 United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) Social Forum (2 and 3 November 2023), is nothing more than a slap in the face given the human rights situation of most Iranians

Iran does not head the UN Human Rights Council, and it never has. Iran is not a member of the UN Human Rights Council, and it never has been. The ambassador of Iran chaired ONE two-day social forum last year where he had no decision-making power over any UN Human Rights activities. It was a bad look, but it had NOTHING to to with heading the UN Human Rights Council and NOTHING to excuse Israel firing on UN peacekeepers.

I wonder if this is the point where @Sccit triples down with a third lie, or if he's going to disappear. Because I've never seen him repent from these blatant lies when murder is on the agenda.
Translation:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,821
Reppin
the ether
I DIDNT DELETE ANYTHING SMH I COPY N PASTED N PUT IT IN URL FORMAT SO THAT IT SHOWS AS A LINK


How many lies are you going to put on top of lies? :heh:



First, you claimed "IRAN HEADS THE UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL"

That was a blatant lie. Iran does not head the Human Rights Council, nor are they even on it.



Then, you claimed "YOU LOVE ARGUING SEMANTICS TO DETRACT FROM THE PRIMARY POINT .. SOULLESS BEHAVIOR"

That was a blatant lie. Iran isn't even on the Council and has never headed it, so stating that they don't head the UN Human Rights Council is not "semantics".



Then, you posted a link claiming "Iran's appointment to chair the 2023 UN Human Rights Council"

But the link does NOT say that Iran was appointed to chair the Human Rights Council. It says that Iran's ambassador volunteered to chair ONE SOCIAL MEETING in November 2023, which had no decision-making power. He was not even ON the council, he just chaired a minor social meeting, and that wasn't even this year. You could only get your deceptive link by deleting the last two words of the article title.



Now, you're claiming "I DIDNT DELETE ANYTHING SMH I COPY N PASTED N PUT IT IN URL FORMAT SO THAT IT SHOWS AS A LINK"

Hmmmm.....let's see what it looks like when I copy and paste the link in URL format

Parliamentary question | Iran's appointment to chair the 2023 UN Human Rights Council Social Forum | E-001936/2023 | European Parliament

Oh, would you look at that! When I put it into link format, it gives the ENTIRE title, not deleting "Social Forum" like you did. Your title can only come if you copy-pasted the text the way you wanted it to look WITHOUT "Social Forum" at the end of the line, in an attempt to deceive.



Now you're saying "STILL STICKING TO SEMANTICS WHEN MY POINT REMAINS"

That's your 5th consecutive lie just on this point. How can you claim it's "semantics" that you claimed Iran heads the UN Human Rights Council, when Iran isn't even on the council and has had zero involvement outside of one Social Forum that happened last year?

You can't even repent of all these lies, because you won't admit to them. You know what happens to an unrepentant liar, right?
 
Last edited:

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,821
Reppin
the ether
i dont know why this person hasnt been banned.


He's obviously giving them donations in order to get favoritism in moderation. He's posted the most obvious, cynical lies here to justify human rights atrocities and doesn't get touched no matter how many lies he piles on top of lies.
 
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
24,711
Reputation
4,232
Daps
66,171
Reppin
NULL
STILL STICKING TO SEMANTICS WHEN MY POINT REMAINS

EVIL COUNTRIES WHO PARTAKE IN DISGUSTING HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS ARE PART OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL

NONE OF YOUR GASLIGHTING GAMES WILL CHANGE THE FACT IM POINTING OUT LOL

IRAN WAS INVOLVED IN SOME CAPACITY, BUT THAT STILL HAS NOTHING TO DO WIT MY ACTUAL POINT .. I MAY BE WRONG ABOUT THEM CURRENTLY BEING PART OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL, BUT THATS MOOT

U ARE THE KING OF HYPERFOCUSING ON SEMANTICS TO SIDE STEP THE ACTUAL POINT … MUST BE PART OF YOUR DISORDER TBH
You be juelzing like a MF.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,821
Reppin
the ether
The Israel Defense Forces said in a statement late Thursday that Hezbollah “operates from within and near civilian areas in southern Lebanon, including areas near UNIFIL.” On Thursday, the statement said, IDF troops operating next to the base in Naqoura “instructed the UN forces in the area to remain in protected spaces, following which the forces opened fire.”


Wait, you consider the Israel Defense Forces to be the ultimate authority on whether the Israel Defense Forces is committing war crimes or not? :laff:




"UNIFIL said an Israeli tank fired at a watchtower at the force's main headquarters in Naqoura on Thursday, hitting the tower and causing two peacekeepers to fall out of it."

"Israeli troops also fired at a nearby position, damaging vehicles and a communications system, and on Wednesday "deliberately fired at and disabled" cameras monitoring the area, the peacekeeping force said in a statement."

"Tenenti said the attacks on the watchtower, cameras, communications equipment and lighting had limited the group's monitoring abilities. U.N. sources said they feared Israeli attacks would make it impossible to monitor any violations of international law in the zone."



So are you going to claim that the UN's watchtower snuck outside the complex and wasn't being careful enough? Do you want to claim Hezbollah was using the watchtower at the UN force's main headquarters? Do you want to claim that the UN's own monitoring cameras should have stayed inside?


Lies on top of lies on top of lies.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,135
Reputation
-19,871
Daps
75,065
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Wait, you consider the Israel Defense Forces to be the ultimate authority on whether the Israel Defense Forces is committing war crimes or not? :laff:




"UNIFIL said an Israeli tank fired at a watchtower at the force's main headquarters in Naqoura on Thursday, hitting the tower and causing two peacekeepers to fall out of it."

"Israeli troops also fired at a nearby position, damaging vehicles and a communications system, and on Wednesday "deliberately fired at and disabled" cameras monitoring the area, the peacekeeping force said in a statement."

"Tenenti said the attacks on the watchtower, cameras, communications equipment and lighting had limited the group's monitoring abilities. U.N. sources said they feared Israeli attacks would make it impossible to monitor any violations of international law in the zone."



So are you going to claim that the UN's watchtower snuck outside the complex and wasn't being careful enough? Do you want to claim Hezbollah was using the watchtower at the UN force's main headquarters? Do you want to claim that the UN's own monitoring cameras should have stayed inside?


Lies on top of lies on top of lies.


SO WHAT DO U THINK IS GOING ON? IDF IS JUST SHOOTING AT UN WORKERS FOR FUN??

LOLLL

THIS IS WHAT THEYRE FEEDING U HUH?
 

The God Poster

LWO representa
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
43,987
Reputation
4,721
Daps
133,925
Reppin
NULL
I’m legit confused what y’all arguing about. Is it wrong Israel is firing off at them people?? It’s a yes or no

Some things have gray areas but this ain’t one of them
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,135
Reputation
-19,871
Daps
75,065
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
How many lies are you going to put on top of lies? :heh:



First, you claimed "IRAN HEADS THE UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL"

That was a blatant lie. Iran does not head the Human Rights Council, nor are they even on it.



Then, you claimed "YOU LOVE ARGUING SEMANTICS TO DETRACT FROM THE PRIMARY POINT .. SOULLESS BEHAVIOR"

That was a blatant lie. Iran isn't even on the Council and has never headed it, so stating that they don't head the UN Human Rights Council is not "semantics".



Then, you posted a link claiming "Iran's appointment to chair the 2023 UN Human Rights Council"

But the link does NOT say that Iran was appointed to chair the Human Rights Council. It says that Iran's ambassador volunteered to chair ONE SOCIAL MEETING in November 2023, which had no decision-making power. He was not even ON the council, he just chaired a minor social meeting, and that wasn't even this year. You could only get your deceptive link by deleting the last two words of the article title.



Now, you're claiming "I DIDNT DELETE ANYTHING SMH I COPY N PASTED N PUT IT IN URL FORMAT SO THAT IT SHOWS AS A LINK"

Hmmmm.....let's see what it looks like when I copy and paste the link in URL format

Parliamentary question | Iran's appointment to chair the 2023 UN Human Rights Council Social Forum | E-001936/2023 | European Parliament

Oh, would you look at that! When I put it into link format, it gives the ENTIRE title, not deleting "Social Forum" like you did. Your title can only come if you copy-pasted the text the way you wanted it to look WITHOUT "Social Forum" at the end of the line, in an attempt to deceive.



Now you're saying "STILL STICKING TO SEMANTICS WHEN MY POINT REMAINS"

That's your 5th consecutive lie just on this point. How can you claim it's "semantics" that you claimed Iran heads the UN Human Rights Council, when Iran isn't even on the council and has had zero involvement outside of one Social Forum that happened last year?

You can't even repent of all these lies, because you won't admit to them. You know what happens to an unrepentant liar, right?


ALL THIS JUST TO SAY NOTHING

ARE THERE MULTIPLE COUNTRIES THAT REGULARLY PARTAKE IN BRUTAL HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION IN THE UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL? YES OR NO??

ANYTHING BEYOND THAT IS DETRACTING FROM THE MAIN POINT AND ONLY THE HEZBOLLAH SLURPIN MORONS IS FALLIN FOR THAT

I COPY N PASTED THE MAIN PART OF THE ARTICLE HEADER AND ENTERED IT INTO TEXT SO THAT IT JUST SHOWS THE TITLE… WHEN U POST UP THE LINK ON ITS OWN IT COMES UP AS A CLICKABLE PIC… U PARANOID TALKIN BOUT “LYING”, IT BEING A FORUM DOESNT CHANGE ANYTHING…

HERES A COUPLE OTHERS




KEEP STICKIN TO SEMANTICS THO
 

BigMoneyGrip

I'm Lamont's pops
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
80,585
Reputation
11,046
Daps
318,600
Reppin
Straight from Flatbush
Is-it-real going to bark up a tree and attack a nato ally and they are going to get throughly wrecked and they gonna ask for U.S backing and the U.S will set on the sidelines and tell them to hold their own nuts.. I means they already said as much recently
 

Savvir

Veteran
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
19,099
Reputation
2,719
Daps
99,136
I’m confused tho…

I thought yall were saying UN troops were corrupt.

Like they were raping and trafficking people in Haiti right?

Are the UN the good guys now?
 
Top