I find it funny people are ignoring Hamas' provocation.
Israel CLEARLY overreacted though. They fukked up majorly.
Israel CLEARLY overreacted though. They fukked up majorly.
Jews and Christians lived as dhimmis nikka who the fukk wanna bootlick muslims? I can list countless Muslim atrocities against Jews, a lot by Mohammed himself I’m a student of history and geopolitics, you can’t check me on this topic...golden age of Islam yet nikkas can’t even produce an ibuprofen GTFOH breh...Jordanians not eating at all, the royal family is out begging for crumbs from gulf Arabs...ima write this in all caps, IN 2014, THE UN PALMER COMMISSION REPORT DETERMINED THAT ISRAELS BLOCKADE WAS LEGAL...now you show me what report or resolution said it was illegal... your moveStill wrong. A UN Independent council has said that the blockade is illegal and in violation of international law. I challenge you to find any resolution passed saying the blockade is legal. Gaza is an open air prison. Implying that the West Bank Palestinians have a decent standard of living doesn't include Gazan Palestinians. Jordanians are actually eating very well. Do you have proof that Palestinians enjoy a higher standard of living than any other non-Gulf Arabs? Actually Jews lived decent lives under Arab rule. It wasn't until the Naqba that hostilities toward Jews grew violent in the region. We know Israel has been land grabbing and stealing land since its inception. That's not news. Abandoning the 2 state solution is just another way to grab more land.
All this animosity over the Golden Age of Islam has the Agent in you on 11. But keep that talking that talk Agent.
No they didn’t...people wanna rush the border, they can get clapped nobody gonna sit back and have millions of people cross into their country...I find it funny people are ignoring Hamas' provocation.
Israel CLEARLY overreacted though. They fukked up majorly.
I’m a student of history and geopolitics
A panel of five independent UN rights experts reporting to the UN Human Rights Council rejected that conclusion, saying the blockade had subjected Gazans to collective punishment in "flagrant contravention of international human rights and humanitarian law."
The four-year blockade deprived 1.6 million Palestinians living in the enclave of fundamental rights, they said.
"In pronouncing itself on the legality of the naval blockade, the Palmer Report does not recognize the naval blockade as an integral part of Israel's closure policy towards Gaza which has a disproportionate impact on the human rights of civilians," they said in a joint statement.
An earlier fact-finding mission named by the same UN forum to investigate the flotilla incident also found in a report last September that the blockade violated international law. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) says the blockade violates the Geneva Conventions.
United Nations On 24 January 2008, the United Nations Human Rights Council released a statement calling for Israel to lift its siege on the Gaza Strip, allow the continued supply of food, fuel, and medicine, and reopen border crossings.[193] According to the Jerusalem Post, this was the 15th time in less than two years the council condemned Israel for its human rights record regarding the Palestinian territories.[194] The proceedings were boycotted by Israel and the United States. Prior to this, U.N. Undersecretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, John Holmes, described the blockade as "collective punishment", saying, "We all understand the security problems and the need to respond to that but collective punishment of the people of Gaza is not, we believe, the appropriate way to do that."[195]
On 15 December 2008, following a statement in which he described the embargo on Gaza as a crime against humanity, United Nations Special Rapporteur Richard A. Falk was prevented from entering the Palestinian territories by Israeli authorities and expelled from the region.[196] The Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Itzhak Levanon[197] said that the mandate of the Special Rapporteur was "hopelessly unbalanced," "redundant at best and malicious at worst."[198]
In August 2009, U.N. human rights chief Navi Pillay criticised Israel for the blockade in a 34-page report, calling it a violation of the rules of war.[199]
In March 2010, United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon stated that the blockade of Gaza is causing "unacceptable suffering" and that families were living in "unacceptable, unsustainable conditions".[200]
A UN Fact Finding mission in September 2009 led by South African Judge Richard Goldstone (the Goldstone report) concluded that the blockade was possibly a crime against humanity, and recommended that the matter be referred to the International Criminal Court if the situation has not improved in six months.
In May 2010, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs stated that the formal economy in Gaza has collapsed since the imposition of the blockade.[201] They also stated that the "restrictions imposed on the civilian population by the continuing blockade of the Gaza Strip amount to collective punishment, a violation of international humanitarian law."[202]
In June 2010, United Nations envoy to the Middle East and former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair stated that "The policy of Gaza is counter-productive and what [Israel] should be doing is allow material in to rebuild homes and sanitation and power and water systems and allow business to flourish. Nor do we in fact do damage to the position of Hamas by harming people in Gaza. People are harmed when the quality of service is poor and people cannot work." He also called for Hamas to stop the "terrorism coming out of Gaza".[203] In the same month, Robert Serry, the UN special envoy for Middle East peace process, also said that "The flotilla crisis is the latest symptom of a failed policy. The situation in Gaza is unsustainable and the current policy is unacceptable and counter-productive, and requires a different, more positive strategy. The closure and blockade of the Gaza Strip needs to come to an end. There is now a welcome international consensus on Gaza."[204]
In the September 2011 Palmer Report, the UN investigative committee for the 2010 Flotilla to Gaza said that the Israel's naval blockade of Gaza is legal under international law.[205][206] Later that same month, five independent U.N. rights experts reporting to the U.N. Human Rights Council rejected that conclusion, saying the blockade had subjected Palestinians in Gaza to collective punishment in "flagrant contravention of international human rights and humanitarian law." [207][207]
On one hand you post that the blockade was legal, on the other hand you’re saying it’s illegal is it oochie wally or is it one mic? Palestinians themselves treat minorities in their territory like shyt I’ll never cape for them...it’s illegal by law to convert from Islam in Palestine by punishment of death...them nikkas denying others their freedom homosexuality is punishable in Palestine...seems like they’re the ones treating others like 2nd class citizens but ima let you for Arab zaddy tho...
And Israel is committing atrocities as we speak and it treats Palestinians as second class citizens. So it's no better.
UN independent panel rules Israel blockade of Gaza illegal
Blockade of the Gaza Strip - Wikipedia
Both posts say that the UN panel found the blockade illegal and reject the finding of the report you mentioned. You can't read?On one hand you post that the blockade was legal, on the other hand you’re saying it’s illegal
seems like they’re the ones treating others like 2nd class citizens
I find it funny people are ignoring Hamas' provocation.
Israel CLEARLY overreacted though. They fukked up majorly.
So you’re excusing them shytting on their own citizens while slamming Israel for doing it to them? This why I can’t take you nikkas serious...the hypocrisy is really obvious...Both posts say that the UN panel found the blockade illegal and reject the finding of the report you mentioned. You can't read?
And none of that changes the fact that Israel treats them as second-class citizens, does it?
Go ahead, Agent c00n Juelz. Tell me another
So you’re excusing them shytting on their own citizens
But you’re caping for known human rights abusers that makes no sense...U.S is an occupation force in Afghanistan, would you also cape for the Taliban?No, I'm not letting you use that as an excuse to distract from the issues. Everyone is shytty doesn't excuse the governing and occupying power from being shytty.
You’re suggesting I tell black men to keep carrying weed on them because the racist pigs in uniform shouldn’t be pulling them over to begin with da fukk kinda sense that make? I want my black nikkas to be alive you damn c00n...DO NOT CARRY NOTHING ILLEGAL ON YOU WHEN YOU KNOW MORE OFTEN THAN NOT, POLICE WILL SEARCH YOU JUST FOR BEING BLACK...is it racist that they are profiled? Yes duh...but why Carry illegal shyt on you to make that shyt worst what you’re saying is if police wasn’t disproportionately searching them, they wouldn’t know they got weed on them...that’s some fakkit ass logic right there...
You been insinuating all day that the real problem is blacks being searched disproportionately while that’s a problem, it’s not THE problem...how about nikkas don’t carry illegal shyt with them? You’re acting like we can’t fight cac fakkits and advise nikkas to be smarter when they leaving the house both at the same time...We KNOW as of right now cacs are searching nikkas more, so why carry any illegal substance (guns, drugs) on you and give cac cops more probable cause to stop he next nikka?What nonsense is he talking about? I haven't said one word on that topic.
Notice how he ignored EVERY lie I caught him on and EVERY point I made in order to try to derail with an entirely different topic.
You been insinuating all day that the real problem is blacks being searched disproportionately while that’s a problem, it’s not THE problem...how about nikkas don’t carry illegal shyt with them? You’re acting like we can’t fight cac fakkits and advise nikkas to be smarter when they leaving the house both at the same time...We KNOW as of right now cacs are searching nikkas more, so why carry any illegal substance (guns, drugs) on you and give cac cops more probable cause to stop he next nikka?