calixprynce
...
Student loans should be in last place . nikkas need to stop beggin
Is there a reason that Trump's impeachment is taking precedence over a Stimulus bill?
- Thread starter Born2BKing
- Start date
Student loans should be in last place . nikkas need to stop beggin
OG Talk
Archived
If he gets a chance to run again he would likely win. They can’t risk that happening.
But to be honest. He’s said and done so many impeachable things, the institution would lose credibility if they don’t at least have the trial.
They kinda HAVE to do this right now.
But to be honest. He’s said and done so many impeachable things, the institution would lose credibility if they don’t at least have the trial.
They kinda HAVE to do this right now.
calixprynce
...
this question hasn't been screened by the "administration" yet so the shills can't answer right now
i can tell by avi you cacish . "shills" lol get them whiteboys out yo mouth
You can only impeach a sitting president but democrats give 0 fuks about the constitution so they're going full steam ahead.
The argument about preventing him from running in 2024 makes no sense, why would he run again after Biden got 80mil votes (most vote sin history) when trump was running full steam in 2020? the steam is over, trump can't get 80+ mil votes in 2024 so why continue?
The argument about preventing him from running in 2024 makes no sense, why would he run again after Biden got 80mil votes (most vote sin history) when trump was running full steam in 2020? the steam is over, trump can't get 80+ mil votes in 2024 so why continue?
Last edited:
Born2BKing
Veteran
What did you agree with Trump on? Taxes?I took that into account with MY research and you can't convince me to support biden under any circumstances it's either vote trump or don't vote at allthecoli's opinion means nothing to nobody
calixprynce
...
I dont know if you're serious or trolling
If you trolling its all good. But if you're seriously saying to get rid of the constitution, I don't have anything to say to that because I refuse to argue with stupid no offense
Not get rid of it but that shyt needs to be updated. No even just the constitution but a lot of laws are just outdated. That's how and why 45 was able to exploit and expose shyt.
I was watching this chick on MSNBC this morning and she was talking about how we really don't have laws against domestic terrorism but we have laws against foreign shyt.
I'm not a warhawk. I'm not a fan of dictatorships. I'll just say it's not 1776 anymore and revisions need to be made.
Electoral votes weren't close, but democrats lost states they were expecting to win and came down to the wire in key states they did win.The election wasn't close at all.
I think Obama Romney was closer than Biden Trump
Go read the election thread while the election was happening.
Neo. The Only. The One.
THE ONE
Updates are constantly made to the constitution. They're called amendments
Amendments have been added since 1776
Again I'm not sure what you're arguing here...
you're asking for things that have already been done.Regarding domestic terrorism, terrorism is terrorism. And they already have that in the oath... "protect America from all enemies foreign and domestic"
They could make stronger laws around domestic terrorism but that wouldn't need a constitutional amendment. Congress would just need to create a federal law around it, which I fully expect to happen.
As far as Trump, the strength or weakness of the constitution isn't what allowed him to do what he did. The constitution has set laws against what he did. He just regularly broke those laws and that's why they're on his bumper right now.
This impeachment trial (no matter how it goes) is just the beginning.
foreign policy and transparency...freedom of thought, speech and opinions..section 230
Neo. The Only. The One.
THE ONE
I was in that thread and on election night lots of folks including myself were
But that's a bad argument as most of the votes didn't even come in on election night.
Democrats won every state they expected to win and even flipped Republican states like Georgia and Arizona.
What are you arguing? Maybe I'm not understanding you...
Neo. The Only. The One.
THE ONE
Neo. The Only. The One.
THE ONE
another crybaby ass thread by Trumpset
"nikkas broke , prolly waitin on that stimulus"
@Born2BKing aint Trumpset
He just trying to be fair in his assessment of both parties
Do you realize the bill hasn't been written yet? It has to been written up by the house and then looked at by the senate. This process takes several weeks.
I agree the stimulus should take precedence but these two things aren't competing for their time.
The impeachment trial will be going on IN THE SENATE while the house works on the bill.
You dudes look for reasons to be upset that sometimes aren't even based on correct information.
I agree the stimulus should take precedence but these two things aren't competing for their time.
The impeachment trial will be going on IN THE SENATE while the house works on the bill.
You dudes look for reasons to be upset that sometimes aren't even based on correct information.
Last edited:
The correct answer to the question is ignored so people can bytch about red herrings and non-existent problems. lol.