That's the thing with homosexuals, they can't win.
Evolution and Natural Selection would demand they be culled.
If gay people gave birth to gay children only then they wouldn't survive. Evolution doesn't demand anyone be culled.
That's the thing with homosexuals, they can't win.
Evolution and Natural Selection would demand they be culled.
If gay people gave birth to gay children only then they wouldn't survive. Evolution doesn't demand anyone be culled.
I made this reply to someone else in another thread, I'm posting it here because I don't feel like typing it up again, not because I'm disrespecting you or opinion.
"If we forget Religion/Morality and instead approach the issue of Homosexuality and Society in a purely Logical/Evolutionary perspective then Homosexuals should be culled.
A human being's Genetic Destiny is to produce and protect it's offspring and prepare it to do the same thing for the following generation, if homosexuality really is genetic then
having a child who is gay is nature's way of telling you that your genes suck and your genetic line ends with your child. If you cannot/won't produce offspring you are contributing nothing to
our species and you are taking up resources that are in need for those who will produce offspring; logically you should be killed or exiled so that your "gay genes" do not spread and start this cycle anew.
Note: I do not promote or condone what I just wrote, I don't believe homos should be killed for being homo or that God hates them, etc...."
Yeah... I'm not gonna carry this convo on. You're not really understanding evolution and I'm not into repeating myself. I didn't for one moment assume you condone it btw. You just need more science class.
Get your dikk chopped off cause you want a vagina and convince people u normal brehs
So you wait until these cancerous fakkits have spread before you say shyt?No, because it isnt a wide spread thing. Every other person you see isnt gay so its unnecessary to have a whole lesson about it. That is something that needs to be taught at home. I do think it should be acknowledged. By acting like it doesnt exist makes the situation of hatred and bigotry towards them worse which in the long run causes a lot if bullshyt to occur. Who somebody is fukking is not that important if both people are consenting adults and not forcing their lifestyle on others who arent like them. Most people dont like to see heterosexuals be intimate in public so I dont think gays should get that pass. Just be who you are in the streets(sex is not the only thing your character encompasses) and freak who you want in your own privacy.
is homosexuality a mental disorder? yes.
is it someone's preference? yes.
if someone's preference is to have sex with goats, is that normal? no.
if someone's preference is to have sex with underaged children, is that normal? no.
if someone's preference is to have sex with someone of the same sex, is that normal?
Get butthurt when someone compares gay rights to black rights, but compare homosexuality to bestiality and pedophilia brehs.
Higher Learning.
being black isn't a mental illness, nor has it ever been confused for being a mental illness.
homosexuality on the other hand was actually listed in the DSM as a mental illness.
And it was removed... forty years ago.
right, so why did you mention "Black rights" in a conversation about mental illness?