Mike Otherz
All Star
the way people reacted to his speech? i mean, he's a charismatic dude and a great explainer of stuff, but this dude has thrown black people under the bus too many times for me to fx with him. what do you think.
GOAT? Hardly.
Best President in most of our lifetimes? Definitely.
I have to laugh at some of these dudes who think Obama has it rough with these Rethugs. Clinton had it way worse, especially in terms of the Republican Revolution and his personal life.
Ken Starr.
everyone likes to avoid the criticisms of his housing policies when discussing his ranking among the greats..just sayin'.
out of the 20th and 21st century prez's, i'm giving it to eisenhower.
I don't know, it seems like the Republicans hate Obama way more than they hated Clinton. All these accusations of being a socialist/Muslim/communist/America hater/Marxist/etc. Not to mention the birther shyt.
But then again, I was a kid in the 90s so maybe it didn't seem as bad because I wasn't paying attention to politics.
everyone likes to avoid the criticisms of his housing policies when discussing his ranking among the greats..just sayin'.
out of the 20th and 21st century prez's, i'm giving it to eisenhower.
the way people reacted to his speech? i mean, he's a charismatic dude and a great explainer of stuff, but this dude has thrown black people under the bus too many times for me to fx with him. what do you think.
GOAT? Hardly.
Best President in most of our lifetimes? Definitely.
I have to laugh at some of these dudes who think Obama has it rough with these Rethugs. Clinton had it way worse, especially in terms of the Republican Revolution and his personal life.
Ken Starr.
Don't get me wrong, Obama definetely riled up the racist/xenophobic motherfukkers. Obama's hatred from the populace is WAY worse than what Clinton had to deal with.
I'm talking strictly about Republican contention.
They investigated the man for allegedly playing a part in a murder. They shut down the government to get what they wanted. They dug in every aspect of his personal life and affairs, and put it out in public.
That's not even close.
Over FDR? That's some crazy shyt.
Ike was a true leader, but FDR was revolutionary in many aspects.
"I have just one purpose...and that is to build up a strong progressive Republican Party in this country. If the right wing wants a fight, they are going to get it...before I end up, either this Republican Party will reflect progressivism or I won't be with them anymore."
Ike was publicly noncommittal about Nixon's repeating as the Vice President on his ticket; the question was an especially important one in light of his heart condition. He personally favored Robert Anderson, a Democrat, who rejected his offer
This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence economic, political, even spiritual is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.
In this revolution, research has become central, it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.
The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.