Is Christopher Steele one of the coldest dudes that ever lived?

Stone Cold

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
13,063
Reputation
1,228
Daps
44,052
Reppin
NULL
O

look at your post. People took the “pee tape” in jest. It was always known that part was hearsay and maybe untrue.

It was never taken seriously in any court or by anyone looking into the conduct on an official level.

The fact that you want to take that one part and try to spin it only shows how shytty your position is.

Play dumb like the GOP brehs :mjlol:

If you knew the pee pee tape aspect of the dossier wasn’t true and hearsay (and jest ) wouldn’t that raise red flags about the whole thing? :comeon:

Yes it was brought to and taken seriously in court hence the FISA surveillance

Again Steele’s source told the FBI the whole thing was false in January 2017
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,606
Reputation
3,794
Daps
109,614
Reppin
Tha Land
If you knew the pee pee tape aspect of the dossier wasn’t true and hearsay (and jest ) wouldn’t that raise red flags about the whole thing? :comeon:
No, as it was always stated as such and the info said to be coming from different sources. Same way you wouldn’t take one of the elements of the report that was proven to be true and then just extrapolate that the entire thing is true.

But you know this and would rather play dumb :mjlol:

Yes it was brought to and taken seriously in court hence the FISA surveillance

Again Steele’s source told the FBI the whole thing was false in January 2017
The report itself said that claim was shaky at best, and hearsay.

That part had nothing to do with all the stuff that was proven true, a lot of it the FBI knew to be true before the dossier existed. The FISA application had absolutely nothing to do with the alleged “pee tape”
 

Stone Cold

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
13,063
Reputation
1,228
Daps
44,052
Reppin
NULL
No, as it was always stated as such and the info said to be coming from different sources. Same way you wouldn’t take one of the elements of the report that was proven to be true and then just extrapolate that the entire thing is true.

But you know this and would rather play dumb :mjlol:


The report itself said that claim was shaky at best, and hearsay.

That part had nothing to do with all the stuff that was proven true, a lot of it the FBI knew to be true before the dossier existed. The FISA application had absolutely nothing to do with the alleged “pee tape”
But it was ALL(including the peepee) given to the court and sworn as fact

Now

What was proven true?
Carter Page was a Russian agent? :unimpressed:

Michael Cohen went to Prague? :unimpressed:

The first half of the Mueller Report actually thoroughly debunks the dossier as well
 

Geek Nasty

Brain Knowledgeably Whizzy
Supporter
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
30,872
Reputation
4,969
Daps
116,354
Reppin
South Kakalaka
William Barr and Trumps Justice Dept is not to be trusted. Most of that dossier has already be proven factual. And it sounds like Steele may have been fukkin Ivanka. Or at least friendly with her.

Now the Russian pee story, who knows. I have my doubts, but Putin has something on him

https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.cnn.com%2Fcnnnext%2Fdam%2Fassets%2F180717133009-03-trump-putin-summit-0716-opinion.jpg




Trump is an idiot, Putin has ALL of his cell phone conversations with anyone in Ukraine talking to the White House via cell phone (the Sondland story for one). Plus, I have no doubt that Trump is the mystery man Putin's oligarchs is holding billions for.
 
Top