Dwight Howard
Superstar
How about we let would be death-sentence recipients control their own fate via a choice of elaborate, life-threatening stunts. Ok, say Jeff Roberts murders his two uncles after a drunk fight. Instead of just strapping Jeff to a chair and lethally injecting him, how about we tell Jeff that if he will be given 6 months to train for a dangerous stunt. This stunt involves being dropped in a lion's den in the jungles of Southern Africa. Jeff would have to stay in the den for 4 hours. After the 4 hours is up, Jeff then must exit the den without any assistance. The only real option would be to successfully climb a 200ft iron cage. If Jeff completes the stunt, he's a free man and justice is served. If not, he dies, and justice is served. Its fair a system. Plus the severity of the crime would dictate the difficulty of the stunt. If someone was to blow up a school with students inside, his stunt would be extremely unlikely. Ex: Having to successfully land a jump off of a 400ft building with 2 pillows strapped to your feet and a 100lb weight plate glued to the top of your head. You get 2 weeks to train. If you pull this shyt off, justice served. And in the likely case that you dont, justice served. Its so fair.
Plus it could create revenue. Pay-per-view the stunts and make money off it. Set a betting market for it. shyt allow charity sponsoring. Money can be made.
Plus it could create revenue. Pay-per-view the stunts and make money off it. Set a betting market for it. shyt allow charity sponsoring. Money can be made.
This is stupid. The OP wasn't supposed to be taken seriously
And a forced public execution is an alternative? You talking about killing people for charity..