Take It In Blood
Banned
U know ur winning when everyone is taking shots at u
...I know he's not taking shots when his movies birthed the special effect driven, large scale destruction of cities/monuments "blockbusters" that get pumped out every other summer.![]()
the director of 10, 000 BC, Anonymous, White House down, and Resurgence don't need to be saying shiet
the jack black/ michael cera joint that came out the next year was better, that tells you all you need to know10,000 b.c. white man with dress in the lead role...seen that picture on my Netflix and skipped it...
![]()
Movies have fell in creativity but other than money being used to film marvel movies, I wouldn't blame marvel. The success of television is equal to blamenikkas keep lying to themselves but movies in general have been wild stale/uncreative for damn near a decade now and Marvel and it’s success plays a big ass part in it.
Which is why TV series have boomed in the same time span people are going there if they want to see a great story unfold.
Basically all of them.It’s not box office receipt envy it’s about creating an imagery that will be remembered years to come.
Besides the first Avengers movie, what other Avengers movie have an iconic image that you’re going to remember 50 years from now as you’re sitting in a nursing home?
Basically, director's using the name to promote their current movies. They not slick.Do anything for clout
No it's disneys fault. I keep saying this but they ruin everything. If I could get rid of one company...it would be Disney.Movies have fell in creativity but other than money being used to film marvel movies, I wouldn't blame marvel. The success of television is equal to blame
Not Raytheon, Boeing or Northrop Grumman?No it's disneys fault. I keep saying this but they ruin everything. If I could get rid of one company...it would be Disney.