Incredible Things About Black Genetics

[TezMilli]

If you're gonna publish an article as factual, then its up to you to provide authentic sources to back it up.

Of course, some publications don't like to do that, and as such, get treated with distain and scepticism. We call those types of publications tabloids or "clickbait" like TMZ, Daily Mail, The Sun, Buzzfeed and, indeed, Atlanta Blackstar.

As if that would really change your opinion. Because if it would, you wouldn't rely on strangers in a forum to produce this information for you. With that being said, do your own research like I suggested to you earlier.

 

[Pazzy]

When I said land mass I meant Africa. When I said became weaker I'm talking about the varying degrees of albinism that crackers suffer from. Social construct or not, we are not the same. They are no kin of mine. I don't give a fukk about being the better man in that context. And no we can win if we keep the idea of race because groups of people win when they get on some "fukk everybody else" shyt.

Lol. I can tell you don't read much and are only going by what other people have told you.

You sound like the same people you hate breh. Ignorant and uneducated.

 

[yardman]

Lol. I can tell you don't read much and are only going by what other people have told you.

You sound like the same people you hate breh. Ignorant and uneducated.

Ouch, that hurts.

 

[yardman]

Lol. I can tell you don't read much and are only going by what other people have told you.

You sound like the same people you hate breh. Ignorant and uneducated.

Oh and actually I do read a lot. I'm currently reading "Ancient and Modern Britons" By David Mcritchie. So there goes that. I'm pro-separation and due to that I'm ignorant and uneducated? Because I know we're better and science backs my notion I'm ignorant? Ok.

 

[Starman]

If the world went back to straight physical strength and survival became instinctual again. But the thing is we don't need any of that happen, were already better we just don't know it. This article just shows you were naturally better.

Yes and no. Earlier IQ tests conducted for the purpose of scientific racism was with socially and culturally biased tests. More recent ones have proven that when black and white test subjects who receive the same education are compared, black students out preform them. Interestingly enough, there's another mass IQ test done that focuses more on common sense, survival skills, and cultural adeptness and Africans blew out the competition. Also read that melanin increases the flow of serotonin which increases brain activity and enhances creativity and imagination

Links for all of this, please. I've never heard of any of it.

 

[Jammer22]

I think when races mix over centuries, certain mutations occur and cause certain diseases to become more prevalent.

Even tho ur family lineage may appear to be Black now, you don't know what may have gotten in there during slavery days etc

You want to know what's real interesting though? Native Americans are like 10x as likely to develop it than whites and AAs are about 3x as likely to get it than whites.


We gotta start looking at this shyt a little deeper, especially professional black docs and nurses.

 

[DillaTUDE]

When I said land mass I meant Africa. When I said became weaker I'm talking about the varying degrees of albinism that crackers suffer from. Social construct or not, we are not the same. They are no kin of mine. I don't give a fukk about being the better man in that context. And no we can win if we keep the idea of race because groups of people win when they get on some "fukk everybody else" shyt.

There's clear differences between us and CACs. OP illustrated some of them, but you know nikkas won't accept shyt as fact unless some Europeans verify it as such.

 

[DillaTUDE]

If you're gonna publish an article as factual, then its up to you to provide authentic sources to back it up.

Of course, some publications don't like to do that, and as such, get treated with distain and scepticism. We call those types of publications tabloids or "clickbait" like TMZ, Daily Mail, The Sun, Buzzfeed and, indeed, Atlanta Blackstar.

So basically, unless it's "peer-reviewed" by a bunch of Eurocentric scientists you're unwilling to accept it as fact?

 

[Thighmaster B]

Links for all of this, please. I've never heard of any of it.

The links are all coming from his ass.

 

[ridedolo]

So basically, unless it's "peer-reviewed" by a bunch of Eurocentric scientists you're unwilling to accept it as fact?

this is why it makes no sense arguing with people about these things. they literally expect you to provide sources from the same people you're making your original argument against. what kinda logic is that? it's stupid af

 

[DillaTUDE]

this is why it makes no sense arguing with people about these things. they literally expect you to provide sources from the same people you're making your original argument against. what kinda logic is that? it's stupid af

At the end of the day these scientists aren't aliens. They're human beings just like that the rest of us, which means that they aren't exempt from having personal bias. It wouldn't surprise me if there was a ton of information revealing the truth about blacks that's being obstructed from getting out by these Eurocentric scientists because of the implications it would have on society.

 

[Starman]

At the end of the day these scientists aren't aliens. They're human beings just like that the rest of us, which means that they aren't exempt from having personal bias. It wouldn't surprise me if there was a ton of information revealing the truth about blacks that's being obstructed from getting out by these Eurocentric scientists because of the implications it would have on society.

Sounds cool, but you just can't assume that's the case because it makes you feel good.

Links, please.

 

[DillaTUDE]

Sounds cool, but you just can't assume that's the case because it makes you feel good.

Links, please.

Basically, whatever I theorise must be peer-reviewed by a bunch of scientists of European descent before it can be accepted as fact? No thanks, I have nothing to prove to Eurocentrics such as yourself.

 

[Starman]

Basically, whatever I theorise must be peer-reviewed by a bunch of scientists of European descent before it can be accepted as fact? No thanks, I have nothing to prove to Eurocentrics such as yourself.

 

[MikeyC]

So basically, unless it's "peer-reviewed" by a bunch of Eurocentric scientists you're unwilling to accept it as fact?

If it's published as if it was written by a first year racial studies student on a click-bait website such as the one in the OP then yes, I'm not gonna take this type of information at face value.

this is why it makes no sense arguing with people about these things. they literally expect you to provide sources from the same people you're making your original argument against. what kinda logic is that? it's stupid af

Be a gullible militant, brehs.