"I'm spiritual but not religious." Help me out y'all. What does this mean?

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

When I used to say I'm spiritual, it meant, I believed in god, felt I had a personal relationship with him but didn't fukk with religion at all.

Now, I'm just agnostic.

agnosticism doesn't mean what you think it does.

Agnosticism only answers what you KNOW. You don't KNOW if there a god.

Theism deals with what you believe.

Do you believe there is a god? Yes or no.

Do you know if there is a god? Yes or no.

I don't believe there is a god (based on the lack of evidence supporting the claim) but I do not know if there is a god.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I don't know. It's called belief for a reason.

It could and it could not.

So if you don't know, under what pretenses are you ascribing qualities to it?

 

[Blackout]

So if you don't know, under what pretenses are you ascribing qualities to it?

I'm making guesses. That not asserting that you actually know.

 

[Berniewood Hogan]

Logics crowning achievement so far has been Post Modernism.

POST MODERNISM IS NOT A PRODUCT OF THE ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY THAT LOGIC IS GENERALLY ASSOCIATED WITH, BROTHER! POST MODERNISTS WOULD ARGUE THAT LOGIC IS SIMPLY ANOTHER NARRATIVE, DUDE! MEANWHILE, LOGICIANS WOULD ARGUE THAT POST MODERNISM IS TRITE, CONTRARIAN BULLshyt, MEAN GENE!

 

[Poitier]

POST MODERNISM IS NOT A PRODUCT OF THE ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY THAT LOGIC IS GENERALLY ASSOCIATED WITH, BROTHER! POST MODERNISTS WOULD ARGUE THAT LOGIC IS SIMPLY ANOTHER NARRATIVE, DUDE! MEANWHILE, LOGICIANS WOULD ARGUE THAT POST MODERNISM IS TRITE, CONTRARIAN BULLshyt, MEAN GENE!

POSTMODERNISM IS A SORT OF LOGIC, IN ITSELF, REGARDLESS OF THE SCHOOL OF PHILOSOPHY WITH THE SAME NAMESAKE, BROTHER. I WOULD ARGUE THAT POSTMODERNISM IS CIRCULAR BULLshyt THAT LEADS TO NOWHERE, HOLLYWOOD HOGAN. IRONY? I CANT GET DOWN WITH THAT, BROTHER.

 

[Berniewood Hogan]

POSTMODERNISM IS A SORT OF LOGIC

THIS IS A ROBBERY OF THE WORD LOGIC, BROTHER!

Criticisms of postmodernism are intellectually diverse, including the assertions that postmodernism is meaningless and promotes obscurantism. For example, Noam Chomsky has argued that postmodernism is meaningless because it adds nothing to analytical or empirical knowledge. He asks why postmodernist intellectuals do not respond like people in other fields when asked, "what are the principles of their theories, on what evidence are they based, what do they explain that wasn't already obvious, etc?...If [these requests] can't be met, then I'd suggest recourse to Hume's advice in similar circumstances: 'to the flames'."

 

[Poitier]

THIS IS A ROBBERY OF THE WORD LOGIC, BROTHER!

MY POINT IS THAT IT'S ALL A SHAM, BROTHER!

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I'm making guesses. That not asserting that you actually know.

so leave them where they are.

Guesses.

Stop pretending that you've proven anything.

 

[Blackout]

so leave them where they are.

Guesses.

Stop pretending that you've proven anything.

I never pretended that I proved anything lol.