Scust.
TLR exposes itself every time
TLR exposes itself every time
"If you look at the way these middle school & high school girls dress & carry on... You can see the ones that are potential whores" -- Tariq Nasheed
- Thread starter Buddy
- Start date
Chrishaune
Veteran
I know we're not suprised by Babylon 
SupaDupaFresh
Superstar
Y'all missing the point. He's not highlighting this to raise awareness about sexual predators and how we can save and protect young women in our communities. He's practically speaking TO the predators, telling grown men who aspire to be scumbags how to identify and eventually exploit and control these women for their own gain. Whether he's telling the reader to groom them as children or wait until they're broken adults is neither here nor there my dude.
If a corporate employee talk unempathetically about racist corporate management in a BOOK about teaching other corporate leaders how to effectively build and protect a racist business model, than anyone co-signing or defending his words as "just talking about it" has probably been booked for his Fox News appearance already. C'mon now.
Y'all juelzing like crazy talkin about "hE rIgHt tHo!!!," the go-to phrase for people who desperately want to be on the wrong side of history and cape for the worst human beings. Trump was "riGhT thO" on the coli all of 2018. Tate was "n0T lyIng" when he was saying all types of inhumane dumb shyt about women without disclosing his criminality.
These motherfukkers are only "right" to people that want to tow the lines of defending their shyt instead of coming to terms with who a person they acutally admire really is. He's a grown man sexually observing and analyzing young girls, teaching other grown men how to sexually observe young girls. This shyt is DISGUSTING my dude. It ain't about what's right and wrong. I don't want to spend any part of my day as a grown ass man talking about how young girls dress and act unless the conversation is about doing something positive for our society and future. Tariq is a damn creep and so is anyone seriously pondering how "riGhT" he is about the supposed sexuality of middle school aged frigging girls. I feel disgusting even having to explain this shyt.
This ain't the hill to be defending Tariq and all that fake ass bourgeois FBA shyt on brehs.
Once again, this loser is who got a whole generation of new age c**ns attacking Africans with more vitriol than a st0rmfr0nt account because he saw there's a good hustle in misleading and taking advantage of people who are deep down self-loathing and in desperate need of some sense of attention and self-importance in their lives for his own ends.
This guy can look at a young "foundational black American" woman no older than 13 on the streets, and instead of looking at this with deep remorse for the future of "muh people!!!", he sees cash. So of course it's not beyond him to look at "foundational black American" men desperate for answers and awareness and take advantage of them for money as well. And dudes here actually believe this guy is a genuine revolutionary taking on white supremacists and doing something for others. Because what? He gives you pride in being "black American?" Y'all are as naive as MAGA cacs. Dude is literally the black Donald Trump and his supporters are every bit as sad to watch fall into his trap of phony pride, purpose, and outrage for his own gain.
Guy is a grade-A depraved rip-off artist who doesn't care about anyone or anything except a bank account. Not you, not me, not Africans, no black Americans. Not nobody but himself and his brand. And I'm ashamed at how many people who cannot think for themselves actually think they're listening to a once-in-a-generation thought leader here. Even as he sexualizes kids. Yuck man.
Last edited:
Duke Wy Lin
It's been a good run. Wish y'all the best ✊🏿
Pimps, like other criminal degenerates, typically prey on their own.
You think Tariq had little while girls in mind when he wrote that chapter?
Black girls are far more at risk of grooming than any other race.
Let the kids be kids.
What they wear or dont wear is for their parents or guardians to address if they deem it necessary to.
What they wear or dont wear shouldnt have an impact on any other adult
What they wear or dont wear is for their parents or guardians to address if they deem it necessary to.
What they wear or dont wear shouldnt have an impact on any other adult
SheWantTheD
Veteran
Fam, he went after anything he found attractive.
That YouTuber Melanie King said she ran into R Kelly when she was a teenager and he was tryna pick her up and she came from a religious family.
can somebody give more quotes from the actual book that confirm he's teaching men how to pimp or pick up underage women...
talking about pimping =//= training a person to pimp...
if a book on self defense talks about the dynamics of a knife fight...
whether or not the book promotes actually using a knife depends on the context...
this book is supposed to be about how to pick up girls like tariq said in the video...
is this book showing how to pickup underage girls?
or is it just identifying all aspects of the pimp game...
and then showing how certain aspects also translate to picking up girls (legal)
who has read the book to give insight?
and once again.. i think tariq is a goofy c00n ass grifter...
that just found a lane to hustle like the hood preachers
Breh, you are reaching for a semantic distinction that does not matter.
No way in hell there should be an excerpt in a dating book about which young girls will grow up to be hoes or not.
took some time to go through the book just to see if I was wrong...
this shyt ain't a fukking dating book... it's a pickup guide at best
the chapter on pimping is exactly what I expected it to be...
breaking down the pimp game.. in order to take certain aspects that may be useful in "regular dating"
actually... he specifically says this but instead of "regular dating" he uses "not-so-extreme relationships"
We can have an entirely different debate on whether mentioning underage girls at all was necessary..
but this book is not advocating the idea that underage girls are "dating" targets..
EDIT: shyt after reading it again, the underage part is completely incorrect in a technical sense anyway...
and doesn't even correctly convey the message he was trying to say:
that women choose pimps, and the "pimping" usually starts with an upbringing without guidance/love/security
he's trying to show an example of what a girl with an incorrect upbringing looks like so the reader can relate
but hella hoes were also quiet proper chicks who lacked proper upbringing...
so it's just bad writing overall..
ain’t no explanation needed.took some time to go through the book just to see if I was wrong...
this shyt ain't a fukking dating book... it's a pickup guide at best
the chapter on pimping is exactly what I expected it to be...
breaking down the pimp game.. in order to take certain aspects that may be useful in "regular dating"
actually... he specifically says this but instead of "regular dating" he uses "not-so-extreme relationships"
We can have an entirely different debate on whether mentioning underage girls at all was necessary..
but this book is not advocating the idea that underage girls are "dating" targets..
EDIT: shyt after reading it again, the underage part is completely incorrect in a technical sense anyway...
and doesn't even correctly convey the message he was trying to say:
that women choose pimps, and the "pimping" usually starts with an upbringing without guidance/love/security
he's trying to show an example of what a girl with an incorrect upbringing looks like so the reader can relate
but hella hoes were also quiet proper chicks who lacked proper upbringing...
That shyt was foul to put in a book period. Let alone how incorrect and stupid the point he was trying to make ended up being. Stop it.
Bunchy Carter
I'll Take The Money Over The Honey
Your going to work on a Sunday
Is this you:
This nikka flipping signs down in Time Square on a Sunday
Breh, come on. You know that was a garbage statement. No need to try to justify it in some way or fashion.took some time to go through the book just to see if I was wrong...
this shyt ain't a fukking dating book... it's a pickup guide at best
the chapter on pimping is exactly what I expected it to be...
breaking down the pimp game.. in order to take certain aspects that may be useful in "regular dating"
actually... he specifically says this but instead of "regular dating" he uses "not-so-extreme relationships"
We can have an entirely different debate on whether mentioning underage girls at all was necessary..
but this book is not advocating the idea that underage girls are "dating" targets..
EDIT: shyt after reading it again, the underage part is completely incorrect in a technical sense anyway...
and doesn't even correctly convey the message he was trying to say:
that women choose pimps, and the "pimping" usually starts with an upbringing without guidance/love/security
he's trying to show an example of what a girl with an incorrect upbringing looks like so the reader can relate
but hella hoes were also quiet proper chicks who lacked proper upbringing...
so it's just bad writing overall..
Contrefaire
Superstar
You keep missing the point and idk whether it's intentional or not, but you sound ridiculous. NOWHERE in a book about dating or spitting game to women should there ever be a passage, let alone a chapter about how some underaged (and potentially victims of incest and other sexual abuse) girls dress in a provocative manner and even wind up working as prostitutes. There's just no way to spin this.
If I were reading a book about international travel and how to meet attractive foreign women and the author took a moment to talk about how in some of the poorer Asian countries, mothers will rent out their minor children or how sometimes the preteen daughters of abject poverty will approach adult tourists and try to sell them sex, I'd simply put the book down and call the FBI. Not try to label it as jUsT aN ObSeRvAtIoN or say "but he's right though!"
To even put this in is lowkey telling readers to look for and pursue vulnerable underaged girls as easy sexual conquests.
I think Tariq is a fraud and an agent, but your reading comprehension is off if you think he's saying you should scout schoolgirls for prostitution. His point here is that whores aren't forced into being whores by a pimp, they already have the mentality of a whore before he meets them. As an example, he mentions how some girls dress and behave already in school.This is supposedly on page 73 of "The Art of Mackin'. I know one of yall got it, is this true?Did he get his break telling brehs to scout schoolgrounds and malls like a creep?
that same info about the child abuse could help you identify and avoid the women who come from that background.. judging any book that mentions it regardless of context is disingenuous...
shyt, not mentioning the sex trade when guiding people on dating in 3rd world countries could be considered negligent because having a major sex trafficking industry affects dating dynamics
after going through the book it was completely unnecessary....ain’t no explanation needed.
That shyt was foul to put in a book period. Let alone how incorrect and stupid the point he was trying to make ended up being. Stop it.
not only was it unnecessary, but it was incorrect...
but saying he put it in there specifically to promote pimping on underage girls or promote picking up on underage girls is disingenuous..
and once again... i don't like tariq,
I just don't like incorrect info
the people in this thread are upset at the mere mention of a thing that is horrible...
they have an emotional boundary for what they view as "acceptable" even in making comparisons or analogies...
i understand their beef with what was said...
I think it takes a person who has actually been exposed to that type of dynamic in real life growing up..
to see it for what it is... and not jump to an emotional response
Last edited: